Berlin L J, Brooks-Gunn J, McCarton C, McCormick M C
Center for Young Children and Families, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.
Prev Med. 1998 Mar-Apr;27(2):238-45. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0282.
In this paper we examine the effectiveness of early intervention, especially vis-à-vis (a) child and family risk factors and (b) the pathways to enhanced child and family development. To address these issues we draw on findings from the Infant Health and Development Program (IHDP) for low-birth-weight premature infants. The data we present reveal the considerable effectiveness of the IHDP intervention in enhancing several aspects of early and later child and family development. The findings also illustrate the importance of looking beyond intervention group differences to examine the extent to which early intervention effects are more pronounced for some children and families than others and to examine the processes underlying intervention effects (e.g., exactly how do early interventions change children and families?). For example, both initial and longer-term IHDP intervention effects varied by both characteristics of the children and characteristics of their families. Our data also provide some insight into the processes by which intervention effects may have occurred. We conclude our consideration of these many complexities with suggestions for practice, social policy, and future research.
在本文中,我们考察了早期干预的有效性,特别是相对于(a)儿童和家庭风险因素以及(b)促进儿童和家庭发展的途径而言的有效性。为解决这些问题,我们借鉴了针对低体重早产儿的婴儿健康与发展项目(IHDP)的研究结果。我们展示的数据揭示了IHDP干预在促进儿童早期及后期发展和家庭发展的多个方面具有显著成效。这些发现还表明,除了考察干预组之间的差异外,探究早期干预效果在某些儿童和家庭中比在其他儿童和家庭中更为显著的程度,以及考察干预效果背后的过程(例如,早期干预究竟如何改变儿童和家庭?)也很重要。例如,IHDP的初始干预效果和长期干预效果均因儿童的特征及其家庭的特征而异。我们的数据还为干预效果可能产生的过程提供了一些见解。我们通过对实践、社会政策和未来研究的建议,来结束对这些诸多复杂性的探讨。