Scheithauer W, Kornek G V, Marczell A, Karner J, Salem G, Greiner R, Burger D, Stöger F, Ritschel J, Kovats E, Vischer H M, Schneeweiss B, Depisch D
Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Vienna, Austria.
Br J Cancer. 1998 Apr;77(8):1349-54. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.225.
Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil (FU) and levamisole or FU/leucovorin (LV) has been established as effective adjuvant treatment for patients with stage III colon cancer. Among several other promising treatment strategies in resected colon cancer, intraperitoneal anti-cancer drug administration with its appealing rationale of counteracting microscopic residual disease on peritoneal surfaces and occult metachronous liver metastases by achieving high intraportal drug concentrations has not yet undergone sufficient clinical evaluation. To determine whether a combination of this locoregional therapeutic concept with systemic intravenous administration of FU/LV would yield better results than conventional adjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with FU/levamisole, the present randomized study was initiated. A total of 241 patients with resected stage III or high-risk stage II (T4N0M0) colon cancer were randomly assigned to 'standard therapy' with FU and levamisole, given for a duration of 6 months, or to an investigational arm, consisting of LV 200 mg m(-2) plus FU 350 mg m(-2), both administered intravenously (days 1-4) and intraperitoneally (days 1 and 3) every 4 weeks for a total of six courses. In patients with stage II disease, no significant difference was noted between the two arms after a median follow-up time of 4 years (range 2.5-6 years). Among 196 eligible patients with stage III disease, however, a comparative analysis of the two treatment groups suggested both an improvement in disease-free survival (P = 0.0014) and a survival advantage (P = 0.0005), with an estimated 43% reduction in mortality rate (95% confidence interval 26-70%) in favour of the investigational arm. In agreement with its theoretical rationale, combined intraperitoneal and intravenous FU/LV was particularly effective in reducing locoregional tumour recurrences with or without liver or other organ site involvement (9 vs 25 patients in the FU/levamisole arm; P = 0.005). Treatment-associated side-effects were infrequent and generally mild in both arms, although a lower rate of severe (WHO grade 3) adverse reactions was noted in patients receiving locoregional plus intravenous chemotherapy (3% vs 12%; P = 0.01). The results of this trial suggest that combined intraperitoneal plus systemic intravenous chemotherapy with FU/LV is a promising adjuvant treatment strategy in patients with surgically resected stage III colon carcinoma.
氟尿嘧啶(FU)与左旋咪唑或FU/亚叶酸钙(LV)联合辅助化疗已被确立为III期结肠癌患者的有效辅助治疗方法。在已切除结肠癌的其他几种有前景的治疗策略中,腹腔内抗癌药物给药具有吸引人的理论依据,即通过实现高门静脉药物浓度来对抗腹膜表面的微小残留病灶和隐匿性异时性肝转移,但尚未经过充分的临床评估。为了确定这种局部区域治疗概念与FU/LV全身静脉给药联合使用是否会比传统的FU/左旋咪唑辅助化学免疫疗法产生更好的效果,开展了本项随机研究。共有241例已切除III期或高危II期(T4N0M0)结肠癌患者被随机分配至接受为期6个月的FU和左旋咪唑“标准治疗”组,或进入试验组,试验组由LV 200 mg m(-2)加FU 350 mg m(-2)组成,两者均每4周静脉注射(第1 - 4天)和腹腔内注射(第1天和第3天),共六个疗程。在II期疾病患者中,中位随访时间4年(范围2.5 - 6年)后,两组之间未观察到显著差异。然而,在196例符合条件的III期疾病患者中,两个治疗组的比较分析表明无病生存期有所改善(P = 0.0014)且有生存优势(P = 0.0005),试验组的死亡率估计降低了43%(95%置信区间26 - 70%)。与其理论依据一致,腹腔内和静脉内联合使用FU/LV在减少局部区域肿瘤复发方面特别有效,无论有无肝或其他器官部位受累(FU/左旋咪唑组9例对25例;P = 0.005)。两组治疗相关的副作用都不常见且一般较轻,尽管接受局部区域加静脉化疗的患者严重(WHO 3级)不良反应发生率较低(3%对12%;P = 0.01)。该试验结果表明,FU/LV腹腔内加全身静脉联合化疗是手术切除的III期结肠癌患者一种有前景的辅助治疗策略。