• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左旋-α-乙酰美沙酮维持治疗期间阿片类药物交叉耐受性和戒断抑制的剂量反应分析

Dose-response analysis of opioid cross-tolerance and withdrawal suppression during LAAM maintenance.

作者信息

Houtsmuller E J, Walsh S L, Schuh K J, Johnson R E, Stitzer M L, Bigelow G E

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998 May;285(2):387-96.

PMID:9580575
Abstract

Levo-alpha-acetylmethadol (LAAM) currently is approved as an opioid maintenance treatment. This double-blind study was designed to characterize withdrawal suppression and opioid blockade produced by two different LAAM maintenance doses. Outpatient opioid-dependent volunteers were stabilized (5-7 weeks) on 25 (n = 8) or 75 mg (n = 8) LAAM administered every-other-day with placebo administered on intervening days. After stabilization, four inpatient, randomly ordered experimental sessions were conducted at 24, 48, 72 and 96 hr after LAAM dosing; the timing of these sessions corresponds to intervals that occur during typical thrice-weekly treatment and after a missed dose. During each session, after baseline assessments, ascending doses of hydromorphone (0, 6 and 12 mg i.m.) were administered 45 min apart; physiological, subjective and observer-rated effects were recorded throughout the session. Physiological and subjective indices of opioid withdrawal measured at session base lines increased with time since the last LAAM dose, but did not depend on the maintenance dose. Withdrawal symptoms were mild in both groups, even at 96 hr after LAAM dosing. Hydromorphone produced dose-related opioid agonist effects at all intervals in the 25 mg LAAM group; these effects were attenuated substantially in the 75 mg LAAM group. Time since last LAAM dose had little influence on hydromorphone effects in either group. Thus, 75 mg LAAM provides opioid blockade and withdrawal suppression for up to 96 hr, whereas 25 mg LAAM is relatively ineffective at producing significant opioid blockade.

摘要

左旋 -α- 乙酰美沙朵(LAAM)目前被批准用于阿片类药物维持治疗。这项双盲研究旨在描述两种不同LAAM维持剂量产生的戒断抑制和阿片类药物阻断作用。门诊阿片类药物依赖志愿者分别服用25毫克(n = 8)或75毫克(n = 8)的LAAM,隔天给药,中间日服用安慰剂,持续5 - 7周以达到稳定状态。稳定期后,在LAAM给药后24、48、72和96小时进行了四次住院的随机顺序实验;这些实验时间对应于典型的每周三次治疗期间以及漏服一剂后的间隔时间。在每次实验中,基线评估后,每隔45分钟静脉注射递增剂量的氢吗啡酮(0、6和12毫克);在整个实验过程中记录生理、主观和观察者评定的效果。实验基线时测量的阿片类药物戒断的生理和主观指标随自上次LAAM给药后的时间增加,但不依赖于维持剂量。两组的戒断症状都很轻微,即使在LAAM给药后96小时也是如此。在25毫克LAAM组中,氢吗啡酮在所有时间间隔都产生了剂量相关的阿片类激动剂效应;在75毫克LAAM组中,这些效应显著减弱。自上次LAAM给药后的时间对两组中氢吗啡酮的效应影响很小。因此,75毫克LAAM可提供长达96小时的阿片类药物阻断和戒断抑制作用,而25毫克LAAM在产生显著的阿片类药物阻断方面相对无效。

相似文献

1
Dose-response analysis of opioid cross-tolerance and withdrawal suppression during LAAM maintenance.左旋-α-乙酰美沙酮维持治疗期间阿片类药物交叉耐受性和戒断抑制的剂量反应分析
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998 May;285(2):387-96.
2
Relative potency of levo-alpha-acetylmethadol and methadone in humans under acute dosing conditions.急性给药条件下左-α-乙酰美沙多与美沙酮在人体中的相对效价。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999 May;289(2):936-45.
3
Effects associated with double-blind omission of buprenorphine/naloxone over a 98-h period.在98小时期间双盲停用丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮所产生的效应。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Dec;189(3):297-306. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0571-4. Epub 2006 Sep 30.
4
Intravenous and oral l-alpha-acetylmethadol: pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics in humans.静脉注射和口服l-α-乙酰美沙多:人体药代动力学和药效学研究
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998 Apr;285(1):71-82.
5
l-alpha-Acetylmethadol, l-alpha-acetyl-N-normethadol and l-alpha-acetyl-N,N-dinormethadol: comparisons with morphine and methadone in suppression of the opioid withdrawal syndrome in the dog.左旋α-乙酰美沙多、左旋α-乙酰-N-去甲美沙多和左旋α-乙酰-N,N-二去甲美沙多:与吗啡和美沙酮在抑制犬类阿片戒断综合征方面的比较。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997 Nov;283(2):833-42.
6
Chronic l-alpha-acetylmethadol (LAAM) in rhesus monkeys: tolerance and cross-tolerance to the antinociceptive, ventilatory, and rate-decreasing effects of opioids.恒河猴体内的慢性左旋-α-乙酰美沙醇(LAAM):对阿片类药物的镇痛、通气和心率降低作用的耐受性及交叉耐受性。
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2000 Jul;294(1):168-78.
7
Chronic l-alpha acetylmethadol in rhesus monkeys: discriminative stimulus and other behavioral measures of dependence and withdrawal.恒河猴体内的慢性左旋 - α - 乙酰美沙醇:辨别刺激及其他依赖和戒断行为指标
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998 Dec;287(3):1029-37.
8
A randomized, open-label trial comparing methadone and Levo-Alpha-Acetylmethadol (LAAM) in maintenance treatment of opioid addiction.一项比较美沙酮和左-α-乙酰美沙朵(LAAM)用于阿片类药物成瘾维持治疗的随机开放标签试验。
Pharmacopsychiatry. 2009 Jan;42(1):1-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1083818. Epub 2009 Jan 19.
9
High-dose methadone produces superior opioid blockade and comparable withdrawal suppression to lower doses in opioid-dependent humans.在阿片类药物依赖的人群中,高剂量美沙酮比低剂量美沙酮能产生更好的阿片类药物阻断作用和相当的戒断抑制效果。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002 May;161(2):202-12. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1027-0. Epub 2002 Mar 13.
10
Evaluation of levo-alpha-acetylmethdol (LAAM) as an alternative treatment for methadone maintenance patients who regularly experience withdrawal: a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis.左旋-α-乙酰美沙醇(LAAM)作为经常出现戒断症状的美沙酮维持治疗患者替代治疗方法的评估:药代动力学和药效学分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004 Oct 5;76(1):63-72. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.04.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Targeting practitioners: A review of guidelines, training, and policy in pain management.针对从业者:疼痛管理指南、培训及政策综述
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Apr 1;173 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S22-S30. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.08.641.
2
Separate and combined effects of the cannabinoid agonists nabilone and Δ⁹-THC in humans discriminating Δ⁹-THC.大麻素激动剂纳布啡和 Δ⁹-THC 对人类区分 Δ⁹-THC 的单独和联合作用。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Jul 1;116(1-3):86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.11.019. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
3
Acute pain management for patients receiving maintenance methadone or buprenorphine therapy.
接受美沙酮或丁丙诺啡维持治疗患者的急性疼痛管理
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Jan 17;144(2):127-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-2-200601170-00010.