Bowers C A, Milham L M, Price C
Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando 32816-1390, USA.
J Gen Psychol. 1998 Jan;125(1):5-16. doi: 10.1080/00221309809595572.
An investigation was conducted to identify the degree to which results regarding the lateralization of spatial orientation among men and women are artifacts of test selection. A dual-task design was used to study possible lateralization differences, providing baseline and dual-task measures of spatial-orientation performance, right- and left-hand tapping, and vocalization of "cat, dog, horse." The Guilford-Zimmerman Test (Guilford & Zimmerman, 1953), the Eliot-Price Test (Eliot & Price, 1976), and the Stumpf-Fay Cube Perspectives Test (Stumpf & Fay, 1983) were the three spatial-orientation tests used to investigate possible artifacts of test selection. Twenty-eight right-handed male and 39 right-handed female undergraduates completed random baseline and dual-task sessions. Analyses indicated no significant sex-related differences in spatial-orientation ability for all three tests. Furthermore, there was no evidence of differential lateralization of spatial orientation between the sexes.
进行了一项调查，以确定关于男性和女性空间定向侧化的结果在多大程度上是测试选择的人为产物。采用双任务设计来研究可能的侧化差异，提供空间定向表现、左右手敲击以及说出“猫、狗、马”的基线和双任务测量。吉尔福德-齐默尔曼测试（吉尔福德和齐默尔曼，1953年）、艾略特-普赖斯测试（艾略特和普赖斯，1976年）以及施图姆夫-费伊立方体视角测试（施图姆夫和费伊，1983年）是用于调查测试选择可能的人为产物的三项空间定向测试。28名右利手男性和39名右利手女性本科生完成了随机的基线和双任务环节。分析表明，所有三项测试在空间定向能力上均无显著的性别相关差异。此外，没有证据表明两性之间空间定向的侧化存在差异。
