Suppr超能文献

头孢克肟与氨苄西林-舒巴坦治疗儿童志贺菌病的疗效比较

Comparative efficacy of cefixime and ampicillin-sulbactam in shigellosis in children.

作者信息

Helvaci M, Bektaşlar D, Ozkaya B, Yaprak I, Umurtak B, Ertuğrul A

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, SSK Tepecik Teaching Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Acta Paediatr Jpn. 1998 Apr;40(2):131-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200x.1998.tb01896.x.

Abstract

Shigellosis is still an important health problem in developing and underdeveloped countries as it is resistance to commonly used antibiotics including ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol and tetracycline. Between May 1996 and October 1996, in a prospective randomized double-blind trial, cefixime was compared with ampicillin-sulbactam, both given orally for a period of 5 days, for the treatment of 80 children with acute bloody diarrhea. Forty patients were treated with a single-dose (8 mg/kg per day) of cefixime and the other 40 patients were given three doses of 100 mg/kg per day of ampicillin-sulbactam. After identification of Shigella organisms in stool specimens, nine patients in the cefixime receiving group and six patients in the ampicillin-sulbactam receiving group were excluded from the study. Differences in average age, sex and weight between the cefixime and ampicillin-sulbactam group were statistically meaningless (P > 0.05). Fever and bloody diarrhea were universal features. The efficacy of cefixime was found to be better than ampicillin-sulbactam. Patients given cefixime had a shorter duration of fever (P < 0.01), shorter duration to disappearance of blood in the stool (P < 0.01), reduced time with diarrhea (P < 0.01) and reduced hospitalization time during the 5 study days (P < 0.01) than patients given ampicillin-sulbactam. No adverse effects were observed in the two study groups. This controlled trial showed good efficacy with cefixime compared to ampicillin-sulbactam in the treatment of shigellosis. Single-dose daily oral therapy with cefixime also showed good tolerability. Cefixime should be considered as an alternative drug of choice for shigellosis in children.

摘要

志贺氏菌病在发展中国家和不发达国家仍然是一个重要的健康问题,因为它对包括氨苄青霉素、甲氧苄啶 - 磺胺甲恶唑、氯霉素和四环素在内的常用抗生素具有耐药性。1996年5月至1996年10月期间,在一项前瞻性随机双盲试验中,将头孢克肟与氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦进行比较,二者均口服给药5天,用于治疗80例急性血性腹泻儿童。40例患者接受单剂量(每日8mg/kg)头孢克肟治疗,另外40例患者给予每日3剂、每剂100mg/kg的氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦治疗。在粪便标本中鉴定出志贺氏菌属微生物后,头孢克肟治疗组的9例患者和氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦治疗组的6例患者被排除在研究之外。头孢克肟组和氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦组之间的平均年龄、性别和体重差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。发热和血性腹泻是普遍特征。发现头孢克肟的疗效优于氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦。与接受氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦治疗的患者相比,接受头孢克肟治疗的患者发热持续时间更短(P<0.01),粪便中血液消失的持续时间更短(P<0.01),腹泻时间缩短(P<0.01),并且在5天的研究期间住院时间缩短(P<0.01)。两个研究组均未观察到不良反应。这项对照试验表明,与氨苄西林 - 舒巴坦相比,头孢克肟在治疗志贺氏菌病方面具有良好的疗效。每日单剂量口服头孢克肟治疗也显示出良好的耐受性。头孢克肟应被视为儿童志贺氏菌病的替代首选药物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验