Suppr超能文献

专科医生的通才角色:是否存在一个隐藏的初级保健体系?

The generalist role of specialty physicians: is there a hidden system of primary care?

作者信息

Rosenblatt R A, Hart L G, Baldwin L M, Chan L, Schneeweiss R

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle 98195-4795, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1998 May 6;279(17):1364-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.17.1364.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Despite increased emphasis on primary care in the United States, most care continues to be provided by specialists. The extent to which specialists incorporate elements of primary care in their approach to ambulatory patients is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the extent to which selected medical and surgical subspecialties provide generalist care to Medicare patients, and to compare patterns of care between specialists and generalists.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study of all ambulatory care recorded in Part B of the Washington State Medicare Claims Database in 1994 and 1995.

SETTING

Ambulatory practices in Washington State.

PATIENTS

Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older who made office visits to the study physicians.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The extent to which individual specialties accounted for the majority of visits made by patients to physicians (a measure of continuity), provided care outside the traditional domain of their specialty (a measure of comprehensiveness), and provided influenza immunization.

RESULTS

A total of 373 505 patients constituted the sample. Patients had an average of 7.48 outpatient visits per year; 9.6% saw only generalists, while 14.7% saw only specialists. The practices of general internists and family physicians differ systematically from the practices of most specialists. Approximately half (49.8%) of all ambulatory visits to general internists and family physicians are made by patients for whom they provide the majority of outpatient care, compared with 21.0% of medical specialist and 11.7% of surgical specialist visits. The rate of influenza immunization was 55.4% for patients who received the majority of their care from generalists, 47.7% from medical specialists, and 39.6% from surgical specialists. Pulmonologists, general surgeons, and gynecologists were more likely than other specialists to provide services outside their specialty.

CONCLUSIONS

Most specialists do not assume the principal care responsibility for elderly patients, although a substantial proportion of patients see only specialists for their care. Selected specialties assume the generalist role more often, particularly when they provide the majority of outpatient care for an individual patient.

摘要

背景

尽管美国对初级保健的重视有所增加,但大多数医疗服务仍由专科医生提供。专科医生在其对门诊患者的诊疗方法中纳入初级保健要素的程度尚不清楚。

目的

研究选定的医学和外科学亚专科为医疗保险患者提供全科医疗的程度,并比较专科医生和全科医生的诊疗模式。

设计

对1994年和1995年华盛顿州医疗保险索赔数据库B部分记录的所有门诊医疗进行横断面研究。

地点

华盛顿州的门诊医疗机构。

患者

65岁及以上到研究医生处就诊的医疗保险受益人。

主要观察指标

各个专科占患者看医生就诊次数多数的程度(连续性指标)、在其专科传统领域之外提供医疗服务的程度(综合性指标)以及提供流感疫苗接种的情况。

结果

共有373505名患者构成样本。患者平均每年门诊就诊7.48次;9.6%的患者只看全科医生,而14.7%的患者只看专科医生。普通内科医生和家庭医生的诊疗模式与大多数专科医生的诊疗模式有系统性差异。普通内科医生和家庭医生的所有门诊就诊中,约一半(49.8%)是由他们提供大部分门诊医疗服务的患者进行的,相比之下,医学专科医生的这一比例为21.0%,外科专科医生的这一比例为11.7%。从全科医生处接受大部分医疗服务的患者流感疫苗接种率为55.4%,从医学专科医生处接受服务的患者为47.7%,从外科专科医生处接受服务的患者为39.6%。肺科医生、普通外科医生和妇科医生比其他专科医生更有可能在其专科领域之外提供服务。

结论

大多数专科医生并不承担老年患者的主要医疗责任,尽管有相当比例的患者只看专科医生进行治疗。选定的专科更常承担全科医生的角色,尤其是当它们为个体患者提供大部分门诊医疗服务时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验