• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[合作指南——对精神科社区管理过程质量发展的贡献]

[Cooperation guidelines--a contribution to the development of process quality in psychiatric community management].

作者信息

Längle G, Welte W, Renner G, Roesger U, Waschulewski H

机构信息

Tübinger Forschungsgruppe Sozialpsychiatrie, Universitätsklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 1998 Mar;60(3):148-53.

PMID:9583271
Abstract

Cooperation in the provision of care to individuals with chronic psychiatric illnesses represents a significant criterion for quality. In the Tuebingen administrative district, guidelines for cooperation in the handover of patients to facilities providing follow-up care and in parallel care of patients have been developed. Elements of the guidelines include handover standards, case conferences and case management. The results of accompanying research are encouraging, while indicating the necessity of continued discussion in the individual facilities and in the relevant authorities: The acceptance of the guidelines is high and they are considered useful in concrete practice, but implementation is sometimes hesitant and the instrument provided for documentation is barely used due to time limitations. Only by means of compulsory basic documentation will it be possible to evaluate the guidelines and secure the criteria for quality on a long-term basis. As with other models, integration of neurologists and psychiatrists in private practice into the cooperation with inpatient and outpatient facilities is a problem that must yet be resolved.

摘要

为患有慢性精神疾病的个体提供护理方面的合作是衡量质量的一项重要标准。在图宾根行政区,已经制定了关于将患者交接至提供后续护理的机构以及对患者进行并行护理时的合作指南。该指南的要素包括交接标准、病例讨论会和病例管理。伴随研究的结果令人鼓舞,但也表明在各个机构和相关部门持续进行讨论的必要性:指南的接受度很高,且被认为在具体实践中有用,但实施有时较为迟疑,并且由于时间限制,所提供的用于记录的工具几乎未被使用。只有通过强制性的基本记录,才有可能对指南进行评估并长期确保质量标准。与其他模式一样,将私人执业的神经科医生和精神科医生纳入与住院和门诊机构的合作中是一个尚待解决的问题。

相似文献

1
[Cooperation guidelines--a contribution to the development of process quality in psychiatric community management].[合作指南——对精神科社区管理过程质量发展的贡献]
Gesundheitswesen. 1998 Mar;60(3):148-53.
2
[Management of psychiatric patients in the community--developments up to now, current problems and future perspectives exemplified by the Tübingen district].[社区精神科患者的管理——以图宾根地区为例阐述至今的发展、当前问题及未来展望]
Psychiatr Prax. 1996 Sep;23(5):230-5.
3
[Expectations and service performance of social psychiatry services in free Saxony. An analysis of viewpoints of psychiatric practice and clinical specialists and coworkers of social psychiatric services].[萨克森自由州社会精神病学服务的期望与服务表现。对精神病学实践、临床专家以及社会精神病学服务工作人员观点的分析]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1997 Oct;65(10):461-72. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-996352.
4
[2 class psychiatry].[二级精神病学]
Psychiatr Prax. 1996 Mar;23(2):55-62.
5
[Community management needs a community that cares--the attitude of the population to psychiatric management and psychiatric patients].[社区管理需要一个关怀的社区——民众对精神科管理及精神科患者的态度]
Psychiatr Prax. 1995 Mar;22(2):58-63.
6
[Two-class psychiatry? A psychiatric university clinic in the community].[两类精神病学?社区中的一所精神病学大学诊所]
Psychiatr Prax. 1996 Jul;23(4):187-91.
7
[Need for social psychiatric services--a management model in scientific evaluation].社会精神科服务的需求——科学评估中的一种管理模式
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 1988 May;27(2):103-11.
8
[Contemporary psychiatric care without sectorization?].[没有部门划分的当代精神科护理?]
Psychiatr Prax. 1996 Mar;23(2):54.
9
[The significance of evaluative research for psychiatric management].[评估性研究在精神科管理中的意义]
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz). 1988 Dec;40(12):704-11.
10
[Assessment and implementation of guidelines].[指南的评估与实施]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2003 Apr;42(2):74-82. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38816.