Yokota A, Hirao Y
Kobayasi Institute of Physical Research, Kokubunji, Japan.
Ind Health. 1998 Apr;36(2):120-6. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.36.120.
Level fluctuating vibration has been evaluated by the cumulative index L10, but some investigators suggest that the L10 cannot represent an adverse comment on vibration. In order to clarify the compliant, various factors involving vibration need to be analysed together by statistical methods, for instance factor analysis or quantum theory. The authors investigated the relationship between an evaluation index and human sensation of vibration in a subjective experiment in a wooden house. The subjects were exposed to vertical road traffic vibration reproduced with an electrodynamic vibrator placed near the house. The range of vibration levels at surfaces in contact with the subjects were from 50dB to 70dB in root mean square of frequency weighted acceleration level, i.e. the vibration level. Numbers assigned by the subjects and evaluation indices of the vibration level were analysed by applying the Stevens power law. The results showed that L10 or Leq (55) could become an effective index for the assessment of subjective perception of level fluctuating vibration in a wooden house.
水平波动振动已通过累积指数L10进行评估,但一些研究人员认为L10不能代表对振动的负面评价。为了阐明合规情况,需要通过统计方法,如因子分析或量子理论,对涉及振动的各种因素进行综合分析。作者在一个木屋的主观实验中研究了评估指标与人体振动感觉之间的关系。受试者暴露于放置在房屋附近的电动振动器再现的垂直道路交通振动中。与受试者接触表面的振动水平范围为频率加权加速度水平的均方根50dB至70dB,即振动水平。通过应用史蒂文斯幂定律分析受试者给出的数字和振动水平的评估指标。结果表明,L10或Leq(55)可以成为评估木屋中水平波动振动主观感知的有效指标。