Maeda S, Morioka M, Yonekawa Y, Kanada K, Takahashi Y
Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Kinki University, Osaka, Japan.
Ind Health. 1998 Apr;36(2):112-9. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.36.112.
The road traffic-induced building vibration was recorded continuously for 24 hr in three orthogonal axes outside and inside the building. Several alternative objective methods of quantifying the severity of exposures to whole-body road traffic-induced building vibration are used. The relationship between the results of all objective evaluation methods of vibration-induced by road traffic and the subjective responses to building vibration are compared. It was conducted that the ISO 2631-2 z-axis frequency weighting combined with a measure of vibration dose value (VDV = [integral of a4(t) dt)]1/4 may use a practicable objective evaluation procedure in buildings than L10 percentile vibration levels. It was also cleared that the L10 percentile vibration levels at the ground boundary of the regulation law of Japan Environmental Agency must be low levels.
在建筑物外部和内部的三个正交轴上连续记录道路交通引起的建筑物振动24小时。使用了几种量化全身道路交通引起的建筑物振动暴露严重程度的替代客观方法。比较了道路交通引起的振动的所有客观评估方法的结果与对建筑物振动的主观反应之间的关系。结果表明，与L10百分位振动水平相比，ISO 2631-2 z轴频率加权结合振动剂量值测量（VDV = [a4(t) dt的积分]1/4）可能在建筑物中使用一种可行的客观评估程序。还明确了日本环境厅法规地面边界处的L10百分位振动水平必须是低水平。
