Roberts P R, Black K W, Santamauro J T, Zaloga G P
Department of Anesthesiology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1009, USA.
Nutrition. 1998 Mar;14(3):266-9. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(97)00468-1.
To determine if peptide-based enteral diets improve wound healing when compared to amino acid-based diets, a prospective randomized study was conducted using 38 male Sprague-Dawley rats. Following placement of a standardized abdominal wound, 20 animals were randomized to an isonitrogenous peptide-based (PEP) versus amino acid-based diet (AA) for 10 d. In addition, 18 animals were randomized to an amino acid-based diet supplemented with the peptide carnosine (CARN) or its constituent amino acids (Control). Diets were administered through small bowel feeding tubes. Wound bursting pressure was significantly higher in the PEP animals compared to the AA animals (179+/-9 versus 138+/-12 mmHg; P=0.02). In addition, wound bursting pressure was significantly greater in the CARN animals compared to the Control animals (143+/-10 versus 116+/-8 mmHg; P=0.005). Peptide-based enteral diets improve wound healing when compared to nonpeptide generating amino acid-based diets. We also conclude that the dietary peptide carnosine represents a dietary peptide that improves wound healing when administered as part of a complete enteral formula. This effect on wound healing may be clinically relevant because carnosine is not found in most enteral formulas.
为了确定与氨基酸型饮食相比,肽基肠内饮食是否能改善伤口愈合,使用38只雄性Sprague-Dawley大鼠进行了一项前瞻性随机研究。在造成标准化腹部伤口后,将20只动物随机分为等氮肽基饮食组(PEP)和氨基酸型饮食组(AA),持续10天。此外,将18只动物随机分为补充肽肌肽(CARN)或其组成氨基酸的氨基酸型饮食组(对照组)。通过小肠饲管给予饮食。与AA组动物相比,PEP组动物的伤口破裂压力显著更高(179±9对138±12 mmHg;P=0.02)。此外,与对照组动物相比,CARN组动物的伤口破裂压力显著更大(143±10对116±8 mmHg;P=0.005)。与不产生肽的氨基酸型饮食相比,肽基肠内饮食可改善伤口愈合。我们还得出结论,饮食中的肽肌肽作为完整肠内配方的一部分给药时,是一种能改善伤口愈合的饮食肽。这种对伤口愈合的作用可能具有临床相关性,因为大多数肠内配方中都没有肌肽。