KI67 proliferation index in tumors of the upper urinary tract as related to established prognostic factors and long-term survival.

OBJECTIVE

Nephroureterectomy is the standard treatment for tumors of the renal pelvis and ureter. Conservative management or indication of adjuvant treatment in these neoplasms is based mainly in histological grade and stage. The aim of this study is to assess the relation of Ki67 index with other established prognostic factors and to define its predictive value for long term survival, which could be useful in selecting the best treatment for each individual case.

METHODS

81 patients with urothelial tumors of the renal pelvis and ureter, diagnosed and treated between 1975 and 1993, comprised the present study. Ki67 immunostaining was performed in paraffin-embedded tissue. A cut-off limit of 20% was chosen. Tumor location, histological grade, histological pattern, local (T), nodal (N), vascular and perineural invasion and stage (TNM) were assessed in relation to the proliferation index and as prognostic criteria for survival in both univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The Ki67 proliferation index was found to be related to grade (p < 0.001), T (T0 vs T1-4; p < 0.01), N (p < 0.038), TNM categories (stage 0 vs I-IV; p < 0.048) and perineural invasion (p < 0.01). There was a marginal relation to vascular invasion (p < 0.11). Survival was better for the patients with low proliferating tumors (90%) than for high proliferating ones (67%) (p < 0.02). In the multivariate analysis only T stage was statistically significant (p < 0.01) but a highly suggestive trend was found for the Ki67 index (p < 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor proliferation assessed by Ki67 immunostaining is related to the progression of the disease and proved to be of predictive value for long-term survival in tumors of the renal pelvis and ureter. The Ki67 index is able to detect high-risk patients that could not be cured by radical surgery alone, raising the need for some type of aduvant treatment in these cases. The treatment predictive effect observed in low grade-low stage cases suggests its possible utility in patients managed conservatively.