Briançon S, Alla F, Méjat E, Guillemin F, Villemot J P, Mertes P M, Zannad F
Unité d'épidémiologie, SIMES hôpital Marin, Nancy.
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1997 Dec;90(12):1577-85.
Cardiac failure has a big impact on the daily life of patients and this can be evaluated using quality of life questionnaires. The aim of this study was to translate and adapt for the French population and test the validity of two quality of life self-administered-questionnaires: the Duke health Profile, the Minnesota Quality of Life Questionnaire in Cardiac Failure and one function capacity questionnaire, the Goldman Specific Activity Scale. The questionnaires were translated and retranslated then submitted to a committee of experts: the final version was presented to 30 patients. The study of the quantitative properties of the three instruments was performed on a sample of 74 patients with cardiac failure to assess their validity and 26 stable patients after cardiac transplantation to test reproducibility. The results of this study show that these three instruments are valid and reproducible and are comparable to the original documents: Cronbach's Alpha ranging from 0.54 to 0.78 for the Duke, except for the social dimension, and from 0.73 to 0.93 for the Minnesota, except for its incapacity dimension, intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.6 in all dimensions. The validity of convergence with LVEF and the NYHA measured during hospitalisation for decompensation was poor, except for the Goldman. The three instruments provided coherent information. The authors conclude that a structured method allows transcultural adaptation of instruments of evaluation of quality of life, the French version having comparable properties to the original documents: they may be used for clinical research.
心力衰竭对患者的日常生活有重大影响,这可以通过生活质量问卷进行评估。本研究的目的是对两份生活质量自填式问卷(杜克健康概况问卷、明尼苏达心力衰竭生活质量问卷)以及一份功能能力问卷(戈德曼特定活动量表)进行翻译和改编,使其适用于法国人群,并测试其有效性。问卷先进行翻译和回译,然后提交给一个专家委员会:最终版本提交给30名患者。对74名心力衰竭患者的样本进行这三种工具的定量特性研究,以评估其有效性;对26名心脏移植术后病情稳定的患者进行测试,以检验其可重复性。本研究结果表明,这三种工具是有效的且可重复的,并且与原始文献具有可比性:杜克问卷的克朗巴哈系数除社会维度外为0.54至0.78,明尼苏达问卷除无能力维度外为0.73至0.93,所有维度的组内相关系数均>0.6。除戈德曼问卷外,与失代偿住院期间测量的左心室射血分数(LVEF)和纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级的收敛效度较差。这三种工具提供了连贯的信息。作者得出结论,一种结构化方法可实现生活质量评估工具的跨文化改编,法语版本具有与原始文献相当的特性:它们可用于临床研究。