Suppr超能文献

儿科汽车安全座椅、儿科医生与学会

Pediatric automotive restraints, pediatricians, and the academy.

作者信息

Lieberman H M, Emmet W L, Coulson A H

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1976 Sep;58(3):316-9.

PMID:958757
Abstract

Over 70% of the 192 Southern California Academy pediatricians responding to a survey teach parents about pediatric automotive safety devices but less than 3% do so on every visit. To test two methods of increasing the frequency of teaching, these pediatricians were randomly assigned to either a mailing from the Academy's local chapter (mail group) or a brief presentation by a local pharmaceutical representative at his regular visit (interview group); a follow-up was conducted one month later by mail. Sixty-one percent of the mail group and 49% of the interview group claimed that their teaching on this subject had increased since the original contact. While this difference did not reach statistical significance, it was in the same direction as the preferences for sources of pediatric information expressed by both groups of pediatricians. A special letter from the Academy was ranked most effective and a visit from the pharmaceutical representative was judged least effective. Because of the magnitude of the problem, availability of a solution, proof that pediatricians can influence health behavior related to children and acknowledgment of the Academy's role in pediatric education, an appeal is made for an all-out campaign by the Academy and its members to promote use of appropriate pediatric automotive safety devices.

摘要

在参与一项调查的192名南加州儿科学会的儿科医生中,超过70%的医生会向家长传授儿童汽车安全装置的相关知识,但每次就诊时都这样做的医生不到3%。为了测试两种提高传授频率的方法,这些儿科医生被随机分为两组,一组收到学会当地分会寄来的邮件(邮件组),另一组在当地制药代表定期来访时听取简短介绍(访谈组);一个月后通过邮件进行随访。邮件组中有61%的医生和访谈组中有49%的医生称,自初次接触以来,他们在这个主题上的传授有所增加。虽然这种差异未达到统计学意义,但与两组儿科医生对儿童信息来源的偏好方向一致。学会的一封特别信件被评为最有效,而制药代表的来访被认为最无效。鉴于问题的严重性、解决方案的可行性、儿科医生能够影响与儿童相关的健康行为的证据,以及对学会在儿科教育中作用的认可,呼吁学会及其成员开展一场全面运动,以促进使用合适的儿童汽车安全装置。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验