• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Evaluation of orthodontic treatment outcome: a personal clinical audit using the PAR index (peer assessment rating).

作者信息

Otuyemi O D

机构信息

Department of Preventive and Children's Dentistry, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

出版信息

Afr Dent J. 1995;9:1-8.

PMID:9590893
Abstract

Although various methods have been used to evaluate orthodontic treatment outcome, the PAR index (Peer Assessment Rating) was recently developed for the purpose of assessing treatment standards. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the treatment standard of 52 consecutively treated cases during orthodontic postgraduate training (1991-1993). The pre- and post-treatment study models were collected and analysed using the PAR index. The mean age at start of treatment and the mean treatment duration was 13.6 (+/- 3.6) years and 15.9 (+/- 4.5) months respectively. Dual-arch fixed appliance was the predominant form of treatment employed. A high treatment standard was achieved as indicated by the mean PAR score reduction of 82.6 per cent. Most of the cases (92.3%) showed varying degree of improvement. Of the 4 (7.7%) cases classified as "worse or no difference", three were treated with removable appliances. With the exception of buccal occlusions, treatment showed strong improvement on individual PAR components. The shortcomings of the method of assessment are also discussed.

摘要

相似文献

1
Evaluation of orthodontic treatment outcome: a personal clinical audit using the PAR index (peer assessment rating).
Afr Dent J. 1995;9:1-8.
2
[Efficacy of orthodontic treatment according to the Peer Assessment Rating index].[根据同伴评估评分指数评估正畸治疗的疗效]
Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2003;49:335-51.
3
Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index.使用PAR指数评估治疗及治疗后的变化。
Eur J Orthod. 1997 Jun;19(3):279-88. doi: 10.1093/ejo/19.3.279.
4
Treatment results in dental school orthodontic patients in 1983 and 1993.1983年和1993年牙科学校正畸患者的治疗结果。
Angle Orthod. 1999 Feb;69(1):19-26. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0019:TRIDSO>2.3.CO;2.
5
The PAR index for evaluation of treatment outcomes in orthodontics: a clinical audit of 50 cases.用于评估正畸治疗结果的PAR指数:50例临床审计
Int Orthod. 2014 Mar;12(1):84-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2013.12.013. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
6
Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances in the General Dental Service in Scotland.苏格兰普通牙科服务中使用固定矫治器的正畸治疗。
J Orthod. 2000 Jun;27(2):175-80. doi: 10.1093/ortho/27.2.175.
7
An audit of 'early debond' cases in the national outcomes audit of patients treated with upper and lower fixed appliances by Consultant Orthodontists in the UK.
J Orthod. 2005 Dec;32(4):257-61; discussion 247-8. doi: 10.1179/146531205225021231.
8
The long-term benefits of orthodontic treatment.正畸治疗的长期益处。
Br Dent J. 2002 May 25;192(10):583-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801433.
9
Effectiveness of phase I orthodontic treatment in an undergraduate teaching clinic.本科教学诊所中一期正畸治疗的效果
J Dent Educ. 2007 Sep;71(9):1179-86.
10
Development of a treatment outcome standard as a result of a clinical audit of the outcome of fixed appliance therapy undertaken by hospital-based consultant orthodontists in the UK.
Br Dent J. 2003 Jan 25;194(2):81-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809878.