Mash L K, Miller B H, Nakajima H, Guo I Y, Okabe T
Department of Restorative Sciences, Texas A&M University System-Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas 75266-0677, USA.
Am J Dent. 1997 Aug;10(4):199-202.
To assess the handling characteristics of a gallium alloy triturated with one drop (10 microL) of ethyl alcohol and compare them to those of a high-copper amalgam.
A commercial gallium alloy (Gallium Alloy GFII) and a high-copper amalgam (Tytin) were used. Ten dentists each restored four identical MO preparations in acrylic typodont teeth (two for each material). Each restoration was immediately evaluated by the operator for placement, condensation, proximal contact, carving, and resistance to fracture during matrix removal and overall quality according to a method used previously. The rating scale for each criterion ranged from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). Scores for each criterion for the amalgam and gallium alloy restorations were statistically compared.
The gallium alloy tested was still rated significantly worse (P < or = 0.05) than amalgam for placement, condensation and carving but there were no significant differences in scores for other criteria. The dentists judged the handling of the gallium alloy in all criteria as fair to good and evaluated it as better in placement, condensation and establishment of proximal contact compared to a previous study, mainly because the pre-set material was no longer sticky.
评估用一滴(10微升)乙醇研磨的镓合金的操作特性,并将其与高铜汞合金的操作特性进行比较。
使用一种市售镓合金(镓合金GFII)和一种高铜汞合金(Tytin)。十名牙医分别在丙烯酸类牙模型上修复四个相同的近中邻面(MO)洞型(每种材料两个)。修复完成后,操作人员立即按照之前使用的方法,对每个修复体在就位、压实、邻面接触、雕刻以及去除成形片时的抗折性和整体质量方面进行评估。每个标准的评分范围为1(非常差)至5(非常好)。对汞合金和镓合金修复体各标准的得分进行统计学比较。
所测试的镓合金在就位、压实和雕刻方面的评分仍显著低于汞合金(P≤0.05),但在其他标准的得分上无显著差异。牙医们认为镓合金在所有标准下的操作表现为中等至良好,并且与之前的研究相比,在就位、压实和邻面接触的建立方面评估结果更好,主要是因为预先调好的材料不再发粘。