• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢地尼治疗链球菌性咽炎的五日疗法。头孢地尼咽炎研究组。

Five-day cefdinir treatment for streptococcal pharyngitis. Cefdinir Pharyngitis Study Group.

作者信息

Tack K J, Henry D C, Gooch W M, Brink D N, Keyserling C H

机构信息

Parke-Davis Pharmaceutical Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 May;42(5):1073-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.5.1073.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.42.5.1073
PMID:9593129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC105747/
Abstract

A multicenter, randomized, controlled, investigator-blind study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral cefdinir versus oral penicillin V for the treatment of pharyngitis due to group A beta-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS). Patients 13 years of age and older were randomized to receive either oral cefdinir (300 mg twice a day) for 5 days followed by placebo for 5 days or oral penicillin V (250 mg four times a day) for 10 days. Throat cultures were obtained, and signs and symptoms of pharyngitis were recorded at study admission and follow-up visits on study days 11 to 15, 16 to 20, and 25 to 31. Patients kept a diary to record medication intake and their assessment of throat pain at admission and at each day of study treatment. Five hundred fifty-eight patients were enrolled, of whom 432 (77.4%) were clinically and microbiologically evaluable. The GABHS eradication rates 5 to 10 days after completion of therapy were 193 of 218 (88.5%) in the cefdinir group and 176 of 214 (82.2%) in the penicillin group (P = 0.053). Clinical cure rates were 89.0 and 84.6%, respectively (P = 0.80). By the time of the long-term follow-up visit, 2 to 3 weeks after completion of treatment, 156 of 191 (81.7%) of the assessable cefdinir patients and 152 of 195 (77.9%) of the penicillin patients remained free of GABHS. Both treatments were well tolerated, with adverse reaction rates of 18.3% in the cefdinir study arm and 15.0% in the penicillin study arm (P = 0.278). Five-day treatment with cefdinir is safe and effective therapy for GABHS pharyngitis. Based on its twice-a-day dosage and shorter course of therapy, leading to potentially greater patient compliance, cefdinir may be considered for use in the treatment of pharyngitis caused by GABHS.

摘要

开展了一项多中心、随机、对照、研究者设盲的研究,以评估口服头孢地尼与口服青霉素V治疗A组β溶血性链球菌(GABHS)所致咽炎的安全性和疗效。13岁及以上患者被随机分组,分别接受口服头孢地尼(每日两次,每次300mg),共5天,随后接受5天安慰剂治疗;或口服青霉素V(每日四次,每次250mg),共10天。在研究入组时以及研究第11至15天、第16至20天和第25至31天的随访时采集咽拭子培养标本,并记录咽炎的体征和症状。患者记录日记,以记录药物摄入情况以及入组时和研究治疗期间每天对咽痛的评估。共纳入558例患者,其中432例(77.4%)可进行临床和微生物学评估。治疗完成后5至10天,头孢地尼组218例中有193例(88.5%)GABHS清除,青霉素组214例中有176例(82.2%)GABHS清除(P=0.053)。临床治愈率分别为89.0%和84.6%(P=0.80)。到治疗完成后2至3周的长期随访时,可评估的头孢地尼组患者191例中有156例(81.7%)、青霉素组患者195例中有152例(77.9%)无GABHS感染。两种治疗的耐受性均良好,头孢地尼研究组的不良反应发生率为18.3%,青霉素研究组为15.0%(P=0.278)。头孢地尼5天疗程治疗GABHS咽炎安全有效。基于其每日两次给药且疗程较短,可能使患者依从性更高,头孢地尼可考虑用于治疗GABHS所致咽炎。

相似文献

1
Five-day cefdinir treatment for streptococcal pharyngitis. Cefdinir Pharyngitis Study Group.头孢地尼治疗链球菌性咽炎的五日疗法。头孢地尼咽炎研究组。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 May;42(5):1073-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.5.1073.
2
Comparison of cefdinir and penicillin for the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis. Cefdinir Pharyngitis Study Group.头孢地尼与青霉素治疗链球菌性咽炎的比较。头孢地尼咽炎研究组。
Clin Ther. 1999 Nov;21(11):1873-81. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(00)86735-1.
3
A study of 5-day cefdinir treatment for streptococcal pharyngitis in children. Cefdinir Pediatric Pharyngitis Study Group.儿童链球菌性咽炎的头孢地尼5日治疗研究。头孢地尼儿童咽炎研究组。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997 Jan;151(1):45-9. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1997.02170380049008.
4
A pooled comparison of cefdinir and penicillin in the treatment of group a beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis.头孢地尼与青霉素治疗 A 组β溶血性链球菌性咽扁桃体炎的汇总比较
Clin Ther. 2005 Aug;27(8):1266-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.08.003.
5
Comparison of cefdinir and penicillin V in the treatment of pediatric streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.头孢地尼与青霉素V治疗小儿链球菌性扁桃体咽炎的比较。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000 Dec;19(12 Suppl):S171-3. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200012001-00007.
6
Comparison of cefdinir and penicillin for the treatment of pediatric streptococcal pharyngitis.头孢地尼与青霉素治疗小儿链球菌性咽炎的比较。
Clin Ther. 1999 Sep;21(9):1525-32. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(00)80007-7.
7
Oral clindamycin 300 mg BID compared with oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 1 g BID in the outpatient treatment of acute recurrent pharyngotonsillitis caused by group a beta-hemolytic streptococci: an international, multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded, prospective trial in patients between the ages of 12 and 60 years.口服克林霉素300毫克,每日两次,与口服阿莫西林/克拉维酸1克,每日两次,用于门诊治疗由A组β溶血性链球菌引起的急性复发性咽扁桃体炎:一项针对12至60岁患者的国际、多中心、随机、研究者设盲的前瞻性试验。
Clin Ther. 2006 Jan;28(1):99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.01.006.
8
Five day clarithromycin modified release versus 10 day penicillin V for group A streptococcal pharyngitis: a multi-centre, open-label, randomized study.五日克拉霉素缓释剂与十日青霉素V治疗A组链球菌性咽炎的对照研究:一项多中心、开放标签、随机研究
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002 Feb;49(2):337-44. doi: 10.1093/jac/49.2.337.
9
Loracarbef versus penicillin V in the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis and tonsillitis.氯碳头孢与青霉素V治疗链球菌性咽炎和扁桃体炎的比较。
Infection. 1992 Sep-Oct;20(5):301-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01710806.
10
Meta-analysis of cephalosporin versus penicillin treatment of group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in children.头孢菌素与青霉素治疗儿童A组链球菌性扁桃体咽炎的荟萃分析。
Pediatrics. 2004 Apr;113(4):866-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.4.866.

引用本文的文献

1
Antibiotic duration for common bacterial infections-a systematic review.常见细菌感染的抗生素使用疗程——一项系统评价
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 Jan 29;7(1):dlae215. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae215. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis.不同的抗生素治疗方案用于治疗 A 组链球菌性咽炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 15;11(11):CD004406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004406.pub6.
3
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis.不同的抗生素治疗方案用于治疗 A 组链球菌性咽炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 17;3(3):CD004406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004406.pub5.
4
Short- vs. Long-Course Antibiotic Treatment for Acute Streptococcal Pharyngitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.急性链球菌性咽炎短疗程与长疗程抗生素治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Oct 26;9(11):733. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9110733.
5
Treatment Challenges of Group A Beta-hemolytic Streptococcal Pharyngo-Tonsillitis.A组β溶血性链球菌性咽扁桃体炎的治疗挑战
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jul;21(3):286-296. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1584294. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
6
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis.针对A组链球菌性咽炎的不同抗生素治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 11;9(9):CD004406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004406.pub4.
7
Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of group A streptococcal pharyngitis: 2012 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.临床实践指南:A 组链球菌咽炎的诊断和管理:美国传染病学会 2012 年更新版。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Nov 15;55(10):e86-102. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis629. Epub 2012 Sep 9.
8
Do physician outcome judgments and judgment biases contribute to inappropriate use of treatments? Study protocol.医生的结果判断和判断偏差是否会导致治疗的不当使用?研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2007 Jun 7;2:18. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-2-18.
9
Comparison of European and U.S. results for cephalosporin versus penicillin treatment of group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.欧洲和美国使用头孢菌素与青霉素治疗A组链球菌性扁桃体咽炎的结果比较。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006 Jun;25(6):354-64. doi: 10.1007/s10096-006-0154-7.
10
Cefdinir: a review of its use in the management of mild-to-moderate bacterial infections.头孢地尼:用于治疗轻至中度细菌感染的综述。
Drugs. 2004;64(13):1433-64. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464130-00004.

本文引用的文献

1
Is penicillin the appropriate treatment for recurrent tonsillopharyngitis? Results from a comparative randomized blind study of cefuroxime axetil and phenoxymethylpenicillin in children. The Swedish Study Group.青霉素是复发性扁桃体咽炎的合适治疗方法吗?头孢呋辛酯与苯氧甲基青霉素在儿童中的比较随机盲法研究结果。瑞典研究小组。
Scand J Infect Dis. 1995;27(3):221-8. doi: 10.3109/00365549509019013.
2
A review of the correlation of T-agglutination patterns and M-protein typing and opacity factor production in the identification of group A streptococci.A群链球菌鉴定中T凝集模式、M蛋白分型及透明质酸酶产生的相关性综述。
J Med Microbiol. 1993 May;38(5):311-5. doi: 10.1099/00222615-38-5-311.
3
Five versus ten days treatment of streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis: a randomized controlled trial comparing cefpodoxime proxetil and phenoxymethyl penicillin.链球菌性咽扁桃体炎的五日与十日治疗:一项比较头孢泊肟酯和青霉素V钾的随机对照试验
Scand J Infect Dis. 1994;26(1):59-66. doi: 10.3109/00365549409008592.
4
Streptococcal pharyngitis: the case for penicillin therapy.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1994 Jan;13(1):1-7.
5
Effective short-course treatment of acute group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis. Ten days of penicillin V vs 5 days or 10 days of cefpodoxime therapy in children.A组β溶血性链球菌急性扁桃体咽炎的有效短程治疗。儿童使用青霉素V治疗10天与头孢泊肟治疗5天或10天的对比
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994 Oct;148(10):1053-60. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1994.02170100051010.
6
Treatment of acute streptococcal pharyngitis and prevention of rheumatic fever: a statement for health professionals. Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, the American Heart Association.急性链球菌性咽炎的治疗与风湿热的预防:给卫生专业人员的声明。美国心脏协会青少年心血管疾病理事会风湿热、心内膜炎及川崎病委员会
Pediatrics. 1995 Oct;96(4 Pt 1):758-64.
7
Failure of penicillin to eradicate group A streptococci during an outbreak of pharyngitis.
Lancet. 1980 Sep 6;2(8193):498-502. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)91832-2.
8
Efficacy of benzathine penicillin G in group A streptococcal pharyngitis: reevaluation.苄星青霉素G治疗A组链球菌性咽炎的疗效:重新评估
J Pediatr. 1987 May;110(5):783-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(87)80024-0.
9
Comparison of oral cephalosporins with penicillin therapy for group A streptococcal pharyngitis.
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1986 Nov-Dec;5(6):649-54. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198611000-00010.
10
Comparative in vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of FK482, a new oral cephalosporin.新型口服头孢菌素FK482的体外活性及β-内酰胺酶稳定性比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Oct;33(10):1795-800. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.10.1795.