• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有限重症监护资源的使用:一个伦理困境。

The use of limited critical care resources: an ethical dilemma.

作者信息

Farnalls M

机构信息

Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta.

出版信息

Off J Can Assoc Crit Care Nurs. 1997 Fall;8(3):23-6.

PMID:9594095
Abstract

The following article consists of a review of the literature surrounding the issue of persistent vegetative state (PVS) patients and resource allocation. The author attempts to analyze the question: Should limited critical care resources be used on PVS patients at the risk of denying those resources to others? The author explores such factors as: prognosis and recovery in PVS, life expectancy, and quality of life. As well, resource availability and ICU costs involved in sustaining the life of a PVS patient are examined. Finally, principles such as non-maleficence and beneficence; as well as the critical care professionals attitudes toward this issue; and the moral, ethical, and emotional dilemmas are discussed.

摘要

以下文章是对围绕持续性植物状态(PVS)患者及资源分配问题的文献综述。作者试图分析这样一个问题:有限的重症监护资源是否应用于PVS患者,而这可能会使其他患者无法获得这些资源?作者探讨了诸如以下因素:PVS的预后与康复、预期寿命以及生活质量。此外,还研究了维持PVS患者生命所需的资源可用性及重症监护病房成本。最后,讨论了诸如不伤害原则和有益原则;以及重症监护专业人员对此问题的态度;还有道德、伦理和情感困境。

相似文献

1
The use of limited critical care resources: an ethical dilemma.有限重症监护资源的使用:一个伦理困境。
Off J Can Assoc Crit Care Nurs. 1997 Fall;8(3):23-6.
2
The persistent vegetative state and anencephaly: problematic paradigms for discussing futility and rationing.
Semin Neurol. 1997;17(3):257-63. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1040937.
3
Persistent vegetative state: what decides the cut-off point?持续性植物状态:是什么决定了临界点?
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 1996 Feb;12(1):40-4. doi: 10.1016/s0964-3397(96)81668-5.
4
The Ethics of Continued Life-Sustaining Treatment for those Diagnosed as Brain-dead.对被诊断为脑死亡者继续进行维持生命治疗的伦理问题
Bioethics. 2016 Mar;30(3):151-8. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12178. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
5
Medical futility and aging: ethical implications.医学上的无效性与衰老:伦理意义
Generations. 1994 Winter;18(4):61-5.
6
Accept or divert?接受还是转移?
Nurs Manage. 1999 Sep;30(9):16A, 16D-16E, 16H.
7
Accept or divert ICU patients? A heated ethical debate.接收还是拒收重症监护病房的患者?一场激烈的伦理辩论。
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2000 Sep-Oct;19(5):37-9. doi: 10.1097/00003465-200019050-00010.
8
CPR for patients in a persistent vegetative state?为处于持续性植物状态的患者进行心肺复苏?
CMAJ. 1998 Jul 14;159(1):18-9; author reply 19-20.
9
Physicians' attitudes about the care of patients in the persistent vegetative state: a national survey.医生对持续性植物状态患者护理的态度:一项全国性调查。
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jul 15;125(2):104-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-2-199607150-00004.
10
Culpability and pain management/control in peripheral vascular disease using the ethics of principles and care.运用原则伦理与关怀伦理探讨外周血管疾病中的责任及疼痛管理/控制
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 1991 Sep;3(3):551-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Access to intensive care unit beds for neurosurgery patients: a qualitative case study.神经外科患者使用重症监护病房床位情况:一项定性案例研究。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Sep;74(9):1299-303. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.9.1299.
2
Ethics roundtable: Using new, expensive drugs.伦理圆桌会议:使用新型昂贵药物
Crit Care. 2002 Dec;6(6):473-8. doi: 10.1186/cc1533. Epub 2002 Aug 20.