Fife T D
Barrow Neurological Institute, Department of Clinical Neurology, University of Arizona, Phoenix, USA.
Am J Otol. 1998 May;19(3):345-51.
We reviewed the features of nystagmus in 24 patients with horizontal canal benign positional vertigo (BPV). Patients were treated with canalith repositioning maneuvers. Our goal was to develop a framework for distinguishing horizontal from posterior canal BPV and to further develop a mechanistic model explaining the horizontal canal variant of BPV.
The study design was a retrospective case review with prospective treatment outcome and follow-up.
The study was performed at a secondary and tertiary referral center for vertigo and dizziness.
The diagnosis of horizontal canal BPV was based on: 1) recurrent brief episodes of positional vertigo; 2) paroxysmal bursts of horizontal positional nystagmus; and 3) lack of any other identifiable central nervous system disorder to explain the nystagmus. Patient average age was 62 years, and average duration of symptoms was 12 weeks.
We documented patients' symptoms and the characteristics of nystagmus. We reviewed the effectiveness of several similar canalith repositioning treatments.
We observed and recorded factors that distinguish horizontal from posterior canal BPV. We monitored the direction of nystagmus, the type of maneuver that evoked the nystagmus, and the response to canalith repositioning.
Symptom description alone was not sufficient to distinguish among canal types of BPV. Horizontal geotropic direction-changing positional nystagmus was observed in 19 of 24 patients. The other patients had ageotropic nystagmus. Both types were distinct from the nystagmus of posterior canal BPV. Response to canalith repositioning was 75% at 1 week of follow-up. Conversion of BPV from one canal to another occurred in some patients, but each canal could be treated individually.
Patients with positional vertigo should undergo Dix-Hallpike positioning and supine lateral head turns to each side. Paroxysmal positional horizontal nystagmus that changes direction with changes in head position strongly suggests the diagnosis. Canalith repositioning for posterior canal BPV may fail in horizontal BPV. A 360 degrees barbecue rotation toward the presumably healthy ear done two to four times or until nystagmus disappears may result in more rapid resolution of symptoms.
我们回顾了24例水平半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕(BPV)患者的眼球震颤特征。患者接受了半规管结石复位手法治疗。我们的目标是建立一个区分水平半规管BPV和后半规管BPV的框架,并进一步建立一个解释BPV水平半规管变异型的机制模型。
研究设计为回顾性病例分析,并对治疗结果和随访进行前瞻性研究。
该研究在一家眩晕和头晕的二级及三级转诊中心进行。
水平半规管BPV的诊断基于:1)反复出现的短暂性位置性眩晕发作;2)水平位置性眼球震颤的阵发性发作;3)缺乏任何其他可识别的中枢神经系统疾病来解释眼球震颤。患者平均年龄为62岁,平均症状持续时间为12周。
我们记录了患者的症状和眼球震颤的特征。我们回顾了几种类似的半规管结石复位治疗的有效性。
我们观察并记录了区分水平半规管BPV和后半规管BPV的因素。我们监测了眼球震颤的方向、诱发眼球震颤的手法类型以及对半规管结石复位的反应。
仅症状描述不足以区分BPV的半规管类型。24例患者中有19例观察到水平地向性方向改变的位置性眼球震颤。其他患者有背地性眼球震颤。这两种类型均与后半规管BPV的眼球震颤不同。随访1周时半规管结石复位的有效率为75%。部分患者的BPV从一个半规管转变为另一个半规管,但每个半规管都可以单独治疗。
位置性眩晕患者应进行Dix-Hallpike位检查以及向两侧的仰卧位侧头转。随着头位改变而改变方向的阵发性位置性水平眼球震颤强烈提示该诊断。后半规管BPV的半规管结石复位在水平半规管BPV中可能无效。向患侧耳朵方向进行两到四次360度的烧烤旋转,或直到眼球震颤消失,可能会使症状更快缓解。