Hillman R E, Walsh M J, Wolf G T, Fisher S G, Hong W K
Voice and Speech Laboratory, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston 02114, USA.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1998 May;172:1-27.
This two-part investigation assessed functional outcomes related to communication (including amount of speech therapy), swallowing and eating, and employment status for patients who received one of the two treatment modalities for advanced laryngeal cancer (stage III or IV laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma) in Veterans Administration Cooperative Study #268. One hundred sixty-six patients were randomized to primary surgery (laryngectomy) and radiotherapy (RT), and 166 to induction chemotherapy (CT) and RT. The first investigation dealt with examining and comparing functional outcomes for patients in the two treatment arms of the main study. Results showed clearly that patients with advanced laryngeal cancer are better off from the standpoint of speech communication if they can be treated for this disease without removal of the larynx. In contrast, there were few significant differences between patient groups for other non-speech-related measures. The second investigation focused on communication-related outcomes associated with the rehabilitation of total laryngectomy patients. Results revealed that only relatively small percentages of total laryngectomy patients (6%) developed usable esophageal speech or remained nonvocal (8%), and that a majority of patients ended up as users of artificial electrolarynx (55%) or tracheoesophageal (31%) speech. The results from both investigations are discussed with respect to factors that can influence the rehabilitation process and long-term outcome status of patients who are treated for advanced laryngeal cancer with these two strategies.
这项分为两部分的调查评估了退伍军人管理局合作研究#268中接受两种晚期喉癌(III期或IV期喉鳞状细胞癌)治疗方式之一的患者在沟通(包括言语治疗量)、吞咽与进食以及就业状况方面的功能结局。166名患者被随机分配至原发手术(喉切除术)加放疗(RT)组,166名患者被随机分配至诱导化疗(CT)加RT组。第一项调查旨在检查和比较主要研究中两个治疗组患者的功能结局。结果清楚地表明,对于晚期喉癌患者而言,如果能够在不切除喉部的情况下治疗该疾病,他们在言语沟通方面的状况会更好。相比之下,在其他与言语无关的测量指标上,患者组之间几乎没有显著差异。第二项调查聚焦于全喉切除患者康复相关的沟通结局。结果显示,只有相对较小比例的全喉切除患者(6%)形成了可用的食管语音或保持无发声状态(8%),并且大多数患者最终成为人工电子喉使用者(55%)或采用气管食管语音(31%)。针对这两种治疗晚期喉癌策略下可能影响患者康复过程和长期结局状况的因素,对两项调查的结果进行了讨论。