Quax P H, Grimbergen J M, Lansink M, Bakker A H, Blatter M C, Belin D, van Hinsbergh V W, Verheijen J H
Gaubius Laboratory, TNO-PG, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998 May;18(5):693-701. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.18.5.693.
Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (UPA), particularly when bound to its receptor (UPAR), is thought to play a major role in local proteolytic processes, thus facilitating cell migration as may occur during angiogenesis, neointima and atherosclerotic plaque formation, and tumor cell invasion. To facilitate understanding of the need and function of the UPA/UPAR interaction in cell migration and vascular remodeling, we changed several amino acid residues in UPA so as to interfere with its interaction with its receptor. The receptor-binding domain of UPA has been localized to a region in the growth factor domain between residues 20 and 32. Since the binding of UPA to UPAR appears to be species specific, we used the differences in amino acid sequences in the growth factor domain of UPA between various species to construct a human UPA variant that does not bind to the human UPAR. We substituted Asn22 for its mouse equivalent Tyr by site-directed mutagenesis. This mutant UPA had similar plasminogen activator characteristics as wild-type UPA, including its specific activity and interaction with plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. However, no UPA/UPAR complexes could be observed in cross-linking experiments using DFP-treated 125I-labeled mutant UPA and lysates of various cells, including U937 histiocytic lymphoma cells, phorbol myristate acetate-treated human ECs, and mouse LB6 cells transfected with human UPAR cDNA. In direct binding experiments, DFP-treated 125I-labeled mutant UPA could not bind to phorbol myristate acetate-treated ECs, whereas wild-type UPA did bind. Furthermore, a 25-fold excess of wild-type UPA completely prevented the binding of DFP-treated 125I-labeled wild-type UPA to the human receptor on transfected LB6 cells, whereas an equal amount of mutant UPA had only a very small effect. In ligand blotting assays, very weak binding of mutant UPA to human UPAR could be observed. Changing Asn22 into the other amino acid residues alanine or glutamine had no effect on binding to UPAR on human ECs. The functional integrity of the growth factor domain in the non-receptor binding Asn22Tyr mutant is suggested by the fact that binding of this mutant to a murine UPAR can be restored after additional mutations in the growth factor domain, Asn27,His29,Trp30 to Arg27,Arg29,Arg30. We conclude that Asn22 and Asn27,His29,Trp30 in human UPA are key determinants in the species-specific binding of the enzyme to its receptor and that changing Asn22 into Tyr results in a UPA mutant with strongly reduced binding to UPAR.
尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂(UPA),尤其是当其与受体(UPAR)结合时,被认为在局部蛋白水解过程中起主要作用,从而促进细胞迁移,这在血管生成、新生内膜和动脉粥样硬化斑块形成以及肿瘤细胞侵袭过程中可能会发生。为了便于理解UPA/UPAR相互作用在细胞迁移和血管重塑中的必要性和功能,我们改变了UPA中的几个氨基酸残基,以干扰其与受体的相互作用。UPA的受体结合域已定位到生长因子域中第20至32位残基之间的区域。由于UPA与UPAR的结合似乎具有物种特异性,我们利用不同物种UPA生长因子域中氨基酸序列的差异构建了一种不与人UPAR结合的人UPA变体。我们通过定点诱变将Asn22替换为其小鼠对应物Tyr。这种突变型UPA具有与野生型UPA相似的纤溶酶原激活剂特性,包括其比活性以及与纤溶酶原激活剂抑制剂-1的相互作用。然而,在使用DFP处理的125I标记的突变型UPA和各种细胞(包括U937组织细胞淋巴瘤细胞、佛波酯肉豆蔻酸酯处理的人内皮细胞以及转染了人UPAR cDNA的小鼠LB6细胞)裂解物的交联实验中,未观察到UPA/UPAR复合物。在直接结合实验中,DFP处理的125I标记的突变型UPA不能与佛波酯肉豆蔻酸酯处理的内皮细胞结合,而野生型UPA则可以结合。此外,25倍过量的野生型UPA完全阻止了DFP处理的125I标记的野生型UPA与转染的LB6细胞上的人受体结合,而等量的突变型UPA只有非常小的影响。在配体印迹分析中,可以观察到突变型UPA与人UPAR的结合非常弱。将Asn22替换为其他氨基酸残基丙氨酸或谷氨酰胺对与人内皮细胞上UPAR的结合没有影响。非受体结合的Asn22Tyr突变体中生长因子域的功能完整性通过以下事实得到证明:在生长因子域中Asn27、His29、Trp30进一步突变为Arg27、Arg29、Arg30后,该突变体与小鼠UPAR的结合可以恢复。我们得出结论,人UPA中的Asn22以及Asn27、His29、Trp30是该酶与受体物种特异性结合的关键决定因素,并且将Asn22替换为Tyr会导致与UPAR结合能力大幅降低的UPA突变体。