• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

远程医疗经济评估的一个拟议框架。

A proposed framework for economic evaluation of telemedicine.

作者信息

Sisk J E, Sanders J H

机构信息

Division of Health Policy & Management, Columbia University School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Telemed J. 1998 Spring;4(1):31-7. doi: 10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.31.

DOI:10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.31
PMID:9599071
Abstract

Economic evaluation of telemedicine compares the costs and other consequences of delivering specific services through telemedicine vs. alternative means. Cost-effectiveness analysis, the most common method used for health issues, helps to assess whether the expected health benefits are worth the investment. Telemedicine raises particular challenges for evaluators: a telemedicine system may have multiple uses and joint costs that are difficult to apportion to one service, the existence of a system may lead to expanded indications for use, and technological change may rapidly make an evaluation outdated. Public and private regulation and payment may affect the diffusion of telemedicine. Uncertainty surrounds the policy of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which is still formulating its position. Changes are underway in policies on licensure and credentialing of clinicians, which have traditionally been done by state and by site, to reflect the fact that telemedicine services may cross these regional boundaries. Lack of insurance coverage for telemedicine services has been considered an impediment to adoption with fee-for-service payment. Under capitation payment and fixed budgets, however, providers have financial incentives to use the most efficient method to deliver services, and these arrangements would favor telemedicine if it is the less costly alternative. If telemedicine were most costly and the health benefits worth the cost, monitoring might be needed to ensure the quality of care.

摘要

远程医疗的经济评估比较了通过远程医疗与其他替代方式提供特定服务的成本及其他后果。成本效益分析是用于健康问题的最常用方法,有助于评估预期的健康效益是否值得投资。远程医疗给评估者带来了特殊挑战:远程医疗系统可能有多种用途和共同成本,难以分摊到一项服务上;系统的存在可能导致使用指征扩大;技术变革可能迅速使评估过时。公共和私人监管及支付可能会影响远程医疗的推广。美国食品药品监督管理局的政策存在不确定性,其仍在制定立场。临床医生的执照和资质认证政策正在发生变化,传统上这些认证是由州和地点进行的,以反映远程医疗服务可能跨越这些区域界限这一事实。远程医疗服务缺乏保险覆盖被认为是按服务收费支付方式下采用该服务的障碍。然而,在按人头支付和固定预算的情况下,提供者有经济动机采用最有效的方法提供服务,如果远程医疗是成本较低的选择,这些安排将有利于远程医疗。如果远程医疗成本最高而健康效益值得付出成本,则可能需要进行监测以确保医疗质量。

相似文献

1
A proposed framework for economic evaluation of telemedicine.远程医疗经济评估的一个拟议框架。
Telemed J. 1998 Spring;4(1):31-7. doi: 10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.31.
2
Variation in outpatient mental health service utilization under capitation.按人头付费情况下门诊心理健康服务利用的差异。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005 Mar;8(1):3-14.
3
Telephones, telemedicine, and a technologically neutral coverage policy.电话、远程医疗与技术中立的覆盖政策。
Telemed J. 1998 Summer;4(2):145-52. doi: 10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.145.
4
Telemedicine can lower costs and improve access.远程医疗可以降低成本并改善医疗服务可及性。
Healthc Financ Manage. 2000 Apr;54(4):66-9.
5
New payment model for rural health services in Mongolia.蒙古农村医疗卫生服务的新支付模式。
Rural Remote Health. 2006 Jan-Mar;6(1):434. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
6
Economic winners and losers after introduction of an effective new therapy depend on the type of payment system.引入一种有效的新疗法后,经济上的赢家和输家取决于支付系统的类型。
Am J Manag Care. 1997 May;3(5):743-9.
7
State Medicaid and private payer reimbursement for telemedicine: An overview.州医疗补助计划及私人支付方对远程医疗的报销情况概述
J Telemed Telecare. 2006;12 Suppl 2:S32-9. doi: 10.1258/135763306778393108.
8
Telemedicine-based digital retinal imaging vs standard ophthalmologic evaluation for the assessment of diabetic retinopathy.基于远程医疗的数字视网膜成像与标准眼科评估在糖尿病视网膜病变评估中的比较
Conn Med. 2012 Feb;76(2):85-90.
9
Utilization management in a mixed-payment environment.混合支付环境下的利用管理
Healthc Financ Manage. 1998 Feb;52(2):64-7.
10
Risk pools: payers and providers take the plunge.风险共担池:支付方和医疗服务提供者投身其中。
Healthc Financ Manage. 1999 Nov;53(11):42-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Methodological Frameworks and Dimensions to Be Considered in Digital Health Technology Assessment: Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis.数字健康技术评估中需要考虑的方法学框架和维度:范围综述和主题分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 10;26:e48694. doi: 10.2196/48694.
2
Telemedicine: An Innovative Twist to Primary Health Care in Rural Bangladesh.远程医疗:孟加拉国农村初级卫生保健的创新举措。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720950519. doi: 10.1177/2150132720950519.
3
How to Value Digital Health Interventions? A Systematic Literature Review.
如何评估数字健康干预措施?系统文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 23;17(6):2119. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062119.
4
Assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of the literature.评估远程医疗:文献系统综述
CMAJ. 2001 Sep 18;165(6):765-71.
5
Tele-education in a telemedicine environment: implications for rural health care and academic medical centers.远程医疗环境中的远程教育:对农村医疗保健和学术医疗中心的影响。
J Med Syst. 1999 Apr;23(2):107-22. doi: 10.1023/a:1020589219289.