N Engl J Med. 1998 May 21;338(21):1488-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199805213382102.
Antithrombotic therapy improves the prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndromes, yet the syndromes remain a therapeutic challenge. We evaluated tirofiban, a specific inhibitor of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, in the treatment of unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction.
A total of 1915 patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to receive tirofiban, heparin, or tirofiban plus heparin. Patients received aspirin if its use was not contraindicated. The study drugs were infused for a mean (+/-SD) of 71.3+/-20 hours, during which time coronary angiography and angioplasty were performed when indicated after 48 hours. The composite primary end point consisted of death, myocardial infarction, or refractory ischemia within seven days after randomization.
The study was stopped prematurely for the group receiving tirofiban alone because of excess mortality at seven days (4.6 percent, as compared with 1.1 percent for the patients treated with heparin alone. The frequency of the composite primary end point at seven days was lower among the patients who received tirofiban plus heparin than among those who received heparin alone (12.9 percent vs. 17.9 percent; risk ratio, 0.68; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.88; P=0.004). The rates of the composite end point in the tirofiban-plus-heparin group were also lower than those in the heparin-only group at 30 days (18.5 percent vs. 22.3 percent, P=0.03) and at 6 months (27.7 percent vs. 32.1 percent, P=0.02). At seven days, the frequency of death or myocardial infarction was 4.9 percent in the tirofiban-plus-heparin group, as compared with 8.3 percent in the heparin-only group (P=0.006). The comparable figures at 30 days were 8.7 percent and 11.9 percent (P=0.03), respectively, and those at 6 months were 12.3 percent and 15.3 percent (P=0.06). The benefit was consistent in the various subgroups of patients and in those treated medically as well as those treated with angioplasty. Major bleeding occurred in 3.0 percent of the patients receiving heparin alone and 4.0 percent of the patients receiving combination therapy (P=0.34).
When administered with heparin and aspirin, the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor tirofiban was associated with a lower incidence of ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes than in patients who received only heparin and aspirin.
抗栓治疗可改善急性冠脉综合征患者的预后,但该综合征仍是一个治疗挑战。我们评估了替罗非班(一种血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa受体特异性抑制剂)在不稳定型心绞痛和非Q波心肌梗死治疗中的作用。
1915例患者以双盲方式随机分组,分别接受替罗非班、肝素或替罗非班加肝素治疗。若未禁忌,患者均服用阿司匹林。研究药物平均输注(±标准差)71.3±20小时,在此期间,48小时后根据指征进行冠状动脉造影和血管成形术。复合主要终点包括随机分组后7天内的死亡、心肌梗死或难治性缺血。
单独接受替罗非班治疗的组因7天时死亡率过高而提前终止研究(4.6%,而单独接受肝素治疗的患者为1.1%)。接受替罗非班加肝素治疗的患者7天时复合主要终点的发生率低于单独接受肝素治疗的患者(12.9%对17.9%;风险比为0.68;95%置信区间为0.53至0.88;P = 0.004)。替罗非班加肝素组30天时(18.5%对22.3%,P = 0.03)和6个月时(27.7%对32.1%,P = 0.02)复合终点发生率也低于仅接受肝素治疗的组。7天时,替罗非班加肝素组死亡或心肌梗死的发生率为4.9%,而仅接受肝素治疗的组为8.3%(P = 0.006)。30天时相应数字分别为8.7%和11.9%(P = 0.03),6个月时分别为亦12.3%和15.3%(P = 0.06)。该益处在各亚组患者中以及接受药物治疗和血管成形术治疗的患者中均一致。单独接受肝素治疗的患者中有3.0%发生大出血,接受联合治疗的患者中有4.0%发生大出血(P = 0.34)。
与肝素和阿司匹林联用时,血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa受体抑制剂替罗非班与急性冠脉综合征患者缺血事件发生率低于仅接受肝素和阿司匹林治疗的患者相关。