Woody E, Sadler P
Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1.
Psychol Bull. 1998 Mar;123(2):192-7. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.192.
In response to I. Kirsch and S.J. Lynn's (1998) review of dissociation theories of hypnosis, the authors discuss the role of theory in current hypnosis research. In addition, they show how the 2 dissociation theories, as well as an alternative sociocognitive theory, can be integrated into a dual-system model of action (D.A. Norman & T. Shallice, 1986). Finally, they argue that the essence of dissociation theory does not necessarily rely on special mechanisms, such as the amnesic barrier and hidden observer, which Kirsch and Lynn critiqued.
针对I. 基尔希和S.J. 林恩（1998年）对催眠解离理论的综述，作者们讨论了理论在当前催眠研究中的作用。此外，他们展示了这两种解离理论以及另一种社会认知理论如何能够被整合到一个行动双系统模型中（D.A. 诺曼和T. 沙利斯，1986年）。最后，他们认为解离理论的本质并不一定依赖于诸如失忆障碍和隐藏观察者等特殊机制，而基尔希和林恩对这些机制进行了批判。
