J Trauma Dissociation. 2010;11(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/15299730903317964.
Clark Hull's (1933) research on dissociation was based on a 'straw man' formulation of dissociation; he claimed that dissociation requires noninterference. Hull completely ignored the then-current paradigm of dissociation--dissociation as automatism--and claimed that he had refuted the validity of the phenomenon of dissociation. Hull's view of dissociation held sway in the hypnosis field for 60 years. This essay seeks to retrieve the Janetian paradigm of dissociation as automatism. Automatisms are unexpected, uninitiated, involuntary behaviors that just 'happen.' The author argues that human sensitivity to the experience of involuntariness (a) is quite important, (b) was selected by evolution, and (c) is central to both hypnotic responses and dissociative symptoms. This editorial urges the hypnosis field and the dissociation field to jointly undertake a renewed investigation of the experience of involuntariness and to follow recent neuroimaging studies which indicate that the parietal cortex underlies the experience of involuntariness.
克拉克·赫尔（Clark Hull）（1933 年）对分离的研究基于对分离的“稻草人”表述；他声称分离需要不干涉。赫尔完全忽略了当时正在流行的分离范例——自动分离——并声称他已经反驳了分离现象的有效性。赫尔对分离的看法在催眠领域占据了 60 年的主导地位。本文试图恢复自动分离的让内范式。自动行为是意外的、未经启动的、无意识的行为，只是“发生了”。作者认为，人类对无意识体验的敏感性（a）非常重要，（b）是进化选择的，（c）对催眠反应和分离症状都至关重要。本社论敦促催眠领域和分离领域共同对无意识体验进行重新研究，并遵循最近的神经影像学研究，这些研究表明顶叶皮层是无意识体验的基础。
