Suppr超能文献

使用职业队列进行二噁英的定量癌症风险评估。

Quantitative cancer risk assessment for dioxins using an occupational cohort.

作者信息

Becher H, Steindorf K, Flesch-Janys D

机构信息

German Cancer Research Center, Division of Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Apr;106 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):663-70. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106663.

Abstract

We consider a cohort of 1189 male German factory workers (production period 1952-1984) who produced phenoxy herbicides and were exposed to dioxins. Follow-up until the end of 1992 yielded a significantly increased standardized mortality ratio (SMR) for total cancer (SMR 141; 95% confidence interval 117-168). 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) concentrations up to 2252 ng/kg body fat were measured in 275 cohort members. Other higher chlorinated dioxins and furans also occurred in high concentrations. For quantitative analysis, the integrated TCDD concentration over time was used as an exposure variable, which was calculated using results from half-life estimation for TCDD and workplace history data. The other congeners were expressed as toxic equivalency (TEQ) and compared to TCDD using international toxic equivalency factors. Poisson and Cox regressions were used to investigate dose-response relationships. Various covariables (e.g., exposure to beta-hexachlorocyclohexane, employment characteristics) were considered. In all analyses, TCDD and TEQ exposures were related to total cancer mortality. The power model yielded a relative risk (RR) function RR(x) = (1 + 0.17x)0.326 for TCDD (in microgram/kilogram blood fat x years)--only a slightly better fit than a linear RR function--and RR(x) = (1 + 0.023x)0.795 for TEQ. Investigations on latency did not show strong effects. Different methods were applied to investigate the robustness of the results and yielded almost identical results. The results were used for unit risk estimation. Taking into account different sources of variation, an interval of 10(-3) to 10(-2) for the additional lifetime cancer risk under a daily intake of 1 pg TCDD/kg body weight/day was estimated from the dose-response models considered. Uncertainties regarding the dose-response function remain. These data did not indicate the existence of a threshold value; however, such a value cannot be excluded with any certainty.

摘要

我们研究了1189名德国男性工厂工人组成的队列(生产期为1952 - 1984年),他们生产苯氧基除草剂并接触二噁英。随访至1992年底,总癌症的标准化死亡比(SMR)显著升高(SMR 141;95%置信区间117 - 168)。在275名队列成员中测量到的2,3,7,8 - 四氯二苯并 - p - 二噁英(TCDD)浓度高达2252 ng/kg体脂。其他高氯代二噁英和呋喃也以高浓度出现。为了进行定量分析,将TCDD随时间的综合浓度用作暴露变量,该变量是使用TCDD半衰期估计结果和工作场所历史数据计算得出的。其他同系物以毒性当量(TEQ)表示,并使用国际毒性当量因子与TCDD进行比较。采用泊松回归和Cox回归来研究剂量反应关系。考虑了各种协变量(例如,接触β - 六氯环己烷、就业特征)。在所有分析中,TCDD和TEQ暴露均与总癌症死亡率相关。幂模型得出TCDD(以微克/千克血脂×年计)的相对风险(RR)函数RR(x) = (1 + 0.17x)0.326,其拟合度仅略优于线性RR函数;对于TEQ,RR(x) = (1 + 0.023x)0.795。对潜伏期的研究未显示出强烈影响。应用不同方法来研究结果的稳健性并得出了几乎相同的结果。这些结果用于单位风险估计。考虑到不同的变异来源,根据所考虑的剂量反应模型,估计在每日摄入1 pg TCDD/kg体重/天的情况下,额外终身患癌风险的区间为10(-3)至10(-2)。关于剂量反应函数仍存在不确定性。这些数据并未表明存在阈值;然而,也不能完全排除存在这样一个值的可能性。

相似文献

10
Cancer mortality among workers in chemical plant contaminated with dioxin.
Lancet. 1991 Oct 19;338(8773):959-64. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91835-i.

引用本文的文献

3
TCDD and cancer: a critical review of epidemiologic studies.TCDD 与癌症:流行病学研究的批判性评价。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2011 Aug;41(7):622-36. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2011.560141. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
7
No evidence of dioxin cancer threshold.没有证据表明二噁英存在致癌阈值。
Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Jul;111(9):1145-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.5730.

本文引用的文献

9
PCDD/PCDF in humans, a 1993-update of background data.
Chemosphere. 1994 Nov-Dec;29(9-11):2355-60. doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(94)90404-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验