Schiele F, Meneveau N, Vuillemenot A, Gupta S, Bassand J P
Hôpital Saint-Jacques, Besançon, France.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998 May;44(1):77-82. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199805)44:1<77::aid-ccd19>3.0.co;2-m.
The management of in-stent restenosis remains a subject for debate because no one revascularization option is considered the most appropriate. Since a high restenosis rate still occurs after repeat balloon angioplasty, new techniques are attempted in order to reduce this rate. A combination of high speed rotational atherectomy (HSRA) and adjunctive balloon angioplasty is likely to achieve good results. In small (<3.0 mm diameter) vessels, the risk of interaction between the burr and the stent increases. We thus used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance in the treatment of in-stent restenosis with HSRA in small <3.0 mm small diameter vessels. Nine patients with in-stent restenosis in small vessels were referred for repeat angioplasty. Initial IVUS examination was used to assess the minimal stent struts diameter and to guide the burr size selection. A combination of HSRA and additional balloon angioplasty was performed under IVUS and angiographic guidance. Mean angiographic reference diameter was 2.25 +/- 0.35 mm and mean stent struts diameter was 2.38 +/- 0.20 mm. Burr size was selected approximately 0.5 mm smaller than stent struts diameter and ranged from 1.75 to 2.5 mm, with a 0.88 +/- 0.12 mean burr/artery ratio (range 0.71, 1.08). In two patients, a second larger burr was used. In 4/9 patients, the burr size chosen under IVUS guidance was close to angiographic MLD at stent implantation and thus larger than what would be used without IVUS guidance. Additional balloon angioplasty was decided in all cases, using a 1.1 +/- 0.15 balloon/artery ratio. No complication occurred. Mean relative gain in minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was 94 +/- 90% after HSRA and 54 +/- 34% after balloon angioplasty (total relative gain 180 +/- 100%). IVUS guidance allowed safe management of in-stent restenosis in small vessels using combination of HSRA and balloon angioplasty. Long-term follow-up and comparison with other techniques are necessary to assess whether this technique should be used routinely.
支架内再狭窄的治疗仍然是一个有争议的话题,因为没有一种血管重建方法被认为是最合适的。由于重复球囊血管成形术后仍会出现较高的再狭窄率,人们尝试采用新技术来降低这一比率。高速旋磨术(HSRA)与辅助球囊血管成形术相结合可能会取得良好效果。在小血管(直径<3.0 mm)中,磨头与支架之间相互作用的风险会增加。因此,我们在直径<3.0 mm的小血管中使用血管内超声(IVUS)引导HSRA治疗支架内再狭窄。9例小血管支架内再狭窄患者被转诊接受再次血管成形术。最初的IVUS检查用于评估支架最小支柱直径并指导磨头尺寸选择。在IVUS和血管造影引导下进行HSRA与额外球囊血管成形术相结合的治疗。平均血管造影参考直径为2.25±0.35 mm,平均支架支柱直径为2.38±0.20 mm。磨头尺寸选择比支架支柱直径小约0.5 mm,范围为1.75至2.5 mm,平均磨头/动脉比为0.88±0.12(范围0.71, 1.08)。在2例患者中,使用了第二个更大的磨头。在4/9的患者中,IVUS引导下选择的磨头尺寸接近支架植入时的血管造影最小管腔直径(MLD),因此比没有IVUS引导时使用的尺寸更大。所有病例均决定进行额外的球囊血管成形术,球囊/动脉比为1.1±0.15。未发生并发症。HSRA后最小管腔直径(MLD)的平均相对增加为94±90%,球囊血管成形术后为54±34%(总相对增加为180±100%)。IVUS引导使得在小血管中使用HSRA与球囊血管成形术相结合安全地治疗支架内再狭窄成为可能。有必要进行长期随访并与其他技术进行比较,以评估该技术是否应常规使用。