Barker A, Fickert R, Oehler S, Müller-hill B
Institut für Genetik der Universität zu Köln, Köln, Weyertal 121, D-50931, Germany.
J Mol Biol. 1998 May 8;278(3):549-58. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.1729.
The Escherichia coli Lac and Gal repressors are two members of a large family of bacterial repressor proteins that share significant sequence and structural homology. Efficient repression by all family members requires specific binding to a site or sites close to the transcriptional start of the genes regulated. Both LacR and GalR have to bind to at least two sites for efficient repression, yet they differ in one important respect: LacR is a homotetramer whereas GalR is a homodimer. In an attempt to understand this difference, we studied the operator binding activity of a LacR variant that has the DNA-binding specificity of GalR (LacR-V17A18). A tetrameric version of this protein shows a 30-fold decrease in association rate to operator located on a long (lambda) DNA molecule, in comparison to wild-type LacR, while a dimeric version of this protein shows an unaltered association rate in comparison to dimeric LacR. This reduction in association rate correlates with a broadened DNA-binding specificity for base-pairs 4 and 5 of the operator: examination of an additional LacR variant with an even broader DNA-binding specificity indicates that a tetrameric version also shows a 30-fold decrease in association rate in comparison to wild-type LacR, while a dimeric version again shows an unaltered association rate in comparison to dimeric LacR. This difference in association rate in vitro correlates with whether a tetrameric or dimeric variant of LacR of a given DNA-binding specificity will repress lacZ under control of a single operator more efficiently in vivo. We therefore propose that the formation of stable homotetramers becomes a distinct disadvantage unless a high degree of DNA-binding specificity is also present, and demonstrate that this in indeed the case for GalR-mediated repression of the gal operon. This functional constraint seems to have influenced the evolution of the LacI-GalR family of repressors, most of which have a relatively broad specificity of DNA-binding and most of which form only stable homodimers.
大肠杆菌乳糖阻遏蛋白和半乳糖阻遏蛋白是细菌阻遏蛋白大家族的两个成员,它们在序列和结构上具有显著的同源性。所有家族成员要实现高效阻遏,都需要特异性结合到所调控基因转录起始位点附近的一个或多个位点。乳糖阻遏蛋白(LacR)和半乳糖阻遏蛋白(GalR)都必须结合至少两个位点才能实现高效阻遏,但它们在一个重要方面存在差异:LacR是同四聚体,而GalR是同二聚体。为了理解这种差异,我们研究了具有GalR DNA结合特异性的LacR变体(LacR-V17A18)的操纵子结合活性。与野生型LacR相比,该蛋白的四聚体形式与位于长(λ)DNA分子上的操纵子的结合速率降低了30倍,而该蛋白的二聚体形式与二聚体LacR相比,结合速率未改变。结合速率的降低与操纵子第4和第5碱基对的DNA结合特异性变宽有关:对另一个具有更宽DNA结合特异性的LacR变体的研究表明,与野生型LacR相比,其四聚体形式的结合速率也降低了30倍,而二聚体形式与二聚体LacR相比,结合速率再次未改变。体外结合速率的这种差异与给定DNA结合特异性的LacR四聚体或二聚体变体在体内单个操纵子控制下能否更有效地抑制lacZ相关。因此,我们提出,除非同时存在高度的DNA结合特异性,否则形成稳定的同四聚体将成为一个明显的劣势,并证明对于GalR介导的半乳糖操纵子的阻遏确实如此。这种功能限制似乎影响了LacI-GalR阻遏蛋白家族的进化,其中大多数具有相对较宽的DNA结合特异性,并且大多数仅形成稳定的同二聚体。