• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A comparison of the efficacy, tolerability and safety of azithromycin and co-amoxiclav in the treatment of sinusitis in adults.

作者信息

Clement P A, de Gandt J B

机构信息

ENT Department, Academic Hospital, Free University, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 1998 Mar-Apr;26(2):66-75. doi: 10.1177/030006059802600202.

DOI:10.1177/030006059802600202
PMID:9602984
Abstract

The efficacy, tolerability and safety of azithromycin and co-amoxiclav in the treatment of non-severe acute maxillary/ethmoidal sinusitis were compared in a randomized, open clinical trial in 254 adult patients. The predominant pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae (83 patients). Azithromycin was administered orally to 165 patients at a single daily dose of 500 mg for 3 days, and co-amoxiclav (4:1) to 89 patients, at a dose of 500 mg three times daily for 10 days. The overall clinical response rates were 87.5% for azithromycin and 83.7% for co-amoxiclav at follow-up (day 21-28). Microbiological responses to both drugs were good, with only five patients in each group having a persistent infection after treatment. Both drugs were well tolerated and produced similar incidences of adverse events, which were mostly gastrointestinal. Azithromycin was as effective, and as well tolerated as co-amoxiclav, and its shorter simpler dosing regime may offer advantages in compliance and cost.

摘要

相似文献

1
A comparison of the efficacy, tolerability and safety of azithromycin and co-amoxiclav in the treatment of sinusitis in adults.
J Int Med Res. 1998 Mar-Apr;26(2):66-75. doi: 10.1177/030006059802600202.
2
Comparison of roxithromycin with co-amoxiclav in patients with sinusitis.罗红霉素与阿莫西林克拉维酸钾治疗鼻窦炎患者的疗效比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998 Mar;41 Suppl B:81-4. doi: 10.1093/jac/41.suppl_2.81.
3
A short (3-day) course of azithromycin tablets versus a 10-day course of amoxycillin-clavulanic acid (co-amoxiclav) in the treatment of adults with lower respiratory tract infections and effects on long-term outcome.阿奇霉素片短期(3天)疗程与阿莫西林-克拉维酸(复方阿莫西林)10天疗程治疗成人下呼吸道感染的疗效及对长期预后的影响。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 1997 Jan;9(3):141-6. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(97)00043-5.
4
A randomized, comparative study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a 3-day course of azithromycin versus a 10-day course of co-amoxiclav as treatment of adult patients with lower respiratory tract infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Jun;37 Suppl C:103-13. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.suppl_c.103.
5
Efficacy, safety and tolerability of 3 day azithromycin versus 10 day co-amoxiclav in the treatment of children with acute lower respiratory tract infections.3日阿奇霉素与10日阿莫西林克拉维酸治疗儿童急性下呼吸道感染的疗效、安全性及耐受性比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001 Apr;47(4):441-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/47.4.441.
6
Once-daily, 3-day azithromycin versus a three-times-daily, 10-day course of co-amoxiclav in the treatment of adults with lower respiratory tract infections: results of a randomized, double-blind comparative study.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 Jun;37 Suppl C:93-101. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.suppl_c.93.
7
Randomized, double-blind study of the clinical efficacy of 3 days of azithromycin compared with co-amoxiclav for the treatment of acute otitis media.阿奇霉素治疗3天与阿莫西林克拉维酸治疗急性中耳炎临床疗效的随机双盲研究
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 Sep;52(3):469-72. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg358. Epub 2003 Jul 29.
8
Comparison of azithromycin and co-amoxiclav in the treatment of acute tracheobronchitis and acute infectious exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in adults. Azithromycin Study Group.
J Int Med Res. 1996 Sep-Oct;24(5):407-18. doi: 10.1177/030006059602400502.
9
A single-blind comparison of three-day azithromycin and ten-day co-amoxiclav treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infections.急性下呼吸道感染的三日阿奇霉素与十日阿莫西林克拉维酸治疗的单盲比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jun;31 Suppl E:147-52. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_e.147.
10
Comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of azithromycin and co-amoxiclav in the treatment of acute periapical abscesses.
J Int Med Res. 1998 Oct-Nov;26(5):257-65. doi: 10.1177/030006059802600506.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of azithromycin in treating sinusitis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails.阿奇霉素治疗鼻窦炎患者的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Mar 20;87(4):2324-2335. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003182. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Macrolides: A Canadian Infectious Disease Society position paper.大环内酯类药物:加拿大传染病协会立场文件。
Can J Infect Dis. 2001 Jul;12(4):218-31. doi: 10.1155/2001/657353.
3
The use of macrolides in treatment of upper respiratory tract infections.
大环内酯类药物在上呼吸道感染治疗中的应用。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2006 Mar;6(2):171-81. doi: 10.1007/s11882-006-0056-x.
4
The Use of Macrolides in Treatment of Upper Respiratory Tract Infections.大环内酯类药物在上呼吸道感染治疗中的应用。
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2005 May;7(3):175-184. doi: 10.1007/s11908-005-0031-z.
5
Randomized double-blind study comparing 3- and 6-day regimens of azithromycin with a 10-day amoxicillin-clavulanate regimen for treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis.一项随机双盲研究,比较阿奇霉素3天和6天疗程与阿莫西林-克拉维酸10天疗程治疗急性细菌性鼻窦炎的疗效。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Sep;47(9):2770-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.9.2770-2774.2003.
6
The Microbiology and Management of Acute and Chronic Rhinosinusitis.急慢性鼻窦炎的微生物学与管理
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2001 Jun;3(3):209-216. doi: 10.1007/s11908-001-0022-7.
7
Review of macrolides and ketolides: focus on respiratory tract infections.大环内酯类和酮内酯类药物综述:聚焦呼吸道感染
Drugs. 2001;61(4):443-98. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161040-00003.