Suppr超能文献

氩等离子体电外科凝固术。

Argon plasma electrosurgical coagulation.

作者信息

Platt R C

机构信息

Valleylab Inc, Pfizer Medical Technology Group, USA.

出版信息

Biomed Sci Instrum. 1997;34:332-7.

PMID:9603062
Abstract

Both argon plasma electrosurgical coagulation (APEC) and conventional electrosurgical fulguration (CEF) apply electrosurgical energy to the target tissue through a plasma. Presented here is a detailed examination of this process. Consideration of the fundamental processes and characteristics of plasmas and the various parameters they are dependent upon illuminates and explains the similarities and differences between APEC and CEF. Both APEC and CEF provide non-contact and self-limiting coagulation. The electrical and chemical differences between air and argon are, however, manifested in very different plasmas and tissue effects. Chief among these are the much greater working distance achievable with APEC, its uniformity of tissue effect and the softness of the eschar it produces. The variance of these characteristics and effects as functions of parameters under the control of the surgeon is examined both theoretically and experimentally. Measurements of tissue damage show that they vary with working distance, generator power, and time more controllably and predictably with APEC than with CEF. CEF is shown to have application for pin point coagulation while APEC excels at controlled coagulation of larger areas with greater uniformity of depth.

摘要

氩气等离子体电外科凝固术(APEC)和传统电外科电灼术(CEF)均通过等离子体将电外科能量施加于目标组织。本文对这一过程进行了详细研究。对等离子体的基本过程和特性及其所依赖的各种参数的考量,阐明并解释了APEC和CEF之间的异同。APEC和CEF均提供非接触式和自限性凝固。然而,空气和氩气之间的电学和化学差异体现在截然不同的等离子体和组织效应中。其中最主要的是APEC可实现的工作距离更长、其组织效应的均匀性以及所产生焦痂的柔软性。从理论和实验两方面研究了这些特性和效应随外科医生控制下的参数的变化情况。组织损伤测量结果表明,与CEF相比,APEC在工作距离、发生器功率和时间方面,其变化更可控、更可预测。结果表明,CEF适用于点状凝固,而APEC在大面积的可控凝固方面表现出色,深度均匀性更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验