Dirschl D R, Smith I J
Department of Orthopaedics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Wake Medical Education Institute, Raleigh 27610, USA.
J Trauma. 1998 May;44(5):855-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199805000-00018.
Although many community hospitals and trauma centers reuse external fixator components, no published studies have examined the cost-effectiveness or the effect on the rate of complications of reuse. This study reports the preliminary results of a program for the reuse of selected components of external fixators at a trauma center.
After removal from the patient, fixators were cleaned and examined by a single nurse responsible for the program. Components in good repair were returned to the operating room stock for reuse, whereas those showing specific signs of wear were discarded. No component was used more than three times. The medical center charged patients a loaner fee equal to the hospital's cost for reusable components of external fixators. Data were collected for all fixators applied in the 15 months before and after institution of the program (69 and 65 fixators, respectively).
The overall mean hospital charge for a fixator decreased 32% as a result of the reuse program (from $4,067 to $2,791). For the two fractures most commonly treated with external fixation, the distal radius and tibial plafond fractures, the mean charge decreased 44 and 29%, respectively. The mean hospital cost for a fixator decreased 34% as a result of the program (from $1,864 to $1,238). There were no differences in the rates of reoperation or complications before and after institution of the reuse program. No patient had mechanical failure of a new or reused fixator body.
The preliminary results of this program are encouraging. We recommend that institutions reusing these devices develop specific programs outlining criteria for reuse and guidelines for reprocessing devices for reuse. The results of this study represent an important first step in the validation of the efficacy and safety of reuse of external fixator components.
尽管许多社区医院和创伤中心重复使用外固定器组件,但尚无已发表的研究探讨重复使用的成本效益或对并发症发生率的影响。本研究报告了一家创伤中心对外固定器选定组件进行重复使用计划的初步结果。
从患者身上取下固定器后,由负责该计划的一名护士进行清洁和检查。修复良好的组件返回手术室库存以供重复使用,而那些有特定磨损迹象的组件则被丢弃。任何组件的使用次数均不超过三次。医疗中心向患者收取的借用费等于医院外固定器可重复使用组件的成本。收集了该计划实施前后15个月内应用的所有固定器的数据(分别为69个和65个固定器)。
由于重复使用计划,固定器的总体平均医院收费降低了32%(从4067美元降至2791美元)。对于最常采用外固定治疗的两种骨折,即桡骨远端骨折和胫骨平台骨折,平均收费分别降低了44%和29%。由于该计划,固定器的平均医院成本降低了34%(从1864美元降至1238美元)。重复使用计划实施前后的再次手术率或并发症发生率没有差异。没有患者的新固定器或重复使用的固定器主体出现机械故障。
该计划的初步结果令人鼓舞。我们建议重复使用这些器械的机构制定具体计划,概述重复使用标准和器械再处理以供重复使用的指南。本研究结果是验证外固定器组件重复使用的有效性和安全性的重要第一步。