DiCicco J D, Ostrum R F, Martin B
Orthopaedic Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Grant Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
J Orthop Trauma. 1998 Nov-Dec;12(8):569-71. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199811000-00007.
To evaluate the efficacy and patient satisfaction of office removal of tibial external fixators and to compare the cost of this procedure with the cost of removal of fixators in the operating room.
A visual analog scale (VAS) and a questionnaire were answered by all patients after office external fixator removal. The treatment, complications, and costs were compared with those of patients having external fixator removal in the operating suite.
An urban orthopaedic trauma office with a Level I trauma center.
Two similar groups of patients; thirty fixators removed in the office and twenty-nine fixators removed in the operating room.
Office or operating room removal of tibial external fixators and application of a sterile dressing. A visual analog scale was answered by those patients who had office removal.
Patient satisfaction and pain rating (VAS) with office removal of external fixators. Comparison of costs, infections, time in fixator, and surgical interventions between the office and operating room groups.
Group I had thirty fixators (twenty-nine half-pin fixators) removed in the office. Group II had twenty-nine fixators removed in the operating room. Duration of time in the frame was not statistically different. Antibiotic usage during the fixator treatment period was 69 percent in both groups. On the visual analog scale, twenty-four members (80 percent) of the office fixator removal group rated the pain during removal as less than 25 percent of maximal, including nine (30 percent) who rated the removal as causing no pain. Cost analysis revealed an average cost of $248 for the office group versus $2,160 for the operating room group (p < 0.001).
Due to the cost savings and patient satisfaction, without compromising clinical care, the office is our preferred location for tibial half-pin external fixator removal.
评估门诊拆除胫骨外固定器的疗效及患者满意度,并将该手术的费用与在手术室拆除固定器的费用进行比较。
所有患者在门诊拆除外固定器后填写视觉模拟量表(VAS)和问卷。将治疗情况、并发症及费用与在手术室拆除外固定器的患者进行比较。
设有一级创伤中心的城市骨科创伤门诊。
两组相似的患者;30例在门诊拆除固定器,29例在手术室拆除固定器。
在门诊或手术室拆除胫骨外固定器并应用无菌敷料。在门诊拆除固定器的患者填写视觉模拟量表。
门诊拆除外固定器时患者的满意度和疼痛评分(VAS)。比较门诊组和手术室组之间的费用、感染情况、固定器使用时间及手术干预情况。
第一组在门诊拆除了30个固定器(29个半针固定器)。第二组在手术室拆除了29个固定器。固定器使用时间在两组间无统计学差异。两组在固定器治疗期间抗生素使用率均为69%。在视觉模拟量表上,门诊固定器拆除组的24名成员(80%)将拆除时的疼痛评为小于最大疼痛的25%,其中9名(30%)将拆除评为无疼痛。成本分析显示,门诊组平均费用为248美元,手术室组为2160美元(p<0.001)。
由于在不影响临床护理的情况下节省了费用且患者满意度较高,门诊是我们拆除胫骨半针外固定器的首选地点。