Losinger W C, Bush E J, Hill G W, Smith M A, Garber L P, Rodriguez J M, Kane G
United States Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.
Prev Vet Med. 1998 Feb 27;34(2-3):147-59. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00076-7.
The United States Department of Agriculture's National Animal Health Monitoring System 1995 National Swine Study was designed to estimate management, health and productivity parameters on pig operations in the United States. Sixteen major swine-producing states that accounted for nearly 91% of June 1, 1995 swine inventory and nearly three-fourths of United States swine producers were included in the study. In the initial phase of the study, National Agricultural Statistics Service enumerators collected information from 1477 producers involved in all phases of swine production (farrowing, nursery, and grower/finisher). Of these, 405 operations with > or = 300 finisher pigs (with at least one finisher pig > or = 54 kg) participated in the subsequent component of the study, which involved on-farm visits by state and federal veterinary medical officers and animal health technicians, and which concentrated on the grower/finisher phase of production. Of those eligible to take part in the second phase of the study, participation was higher among independent producers (48.3%) than among contract producers (15.3%). Participation was also higher among operations that used advanced record-keeping systems (such as record cards for individual breeding hogs or a computer-based record-keeping system). Thus, study results could have been influenced by response biases. As a biosecurity measure, 40.5 +/- 2.1% of operations restricted entry to employees only. For operations that permitted non-employees to enter the premises, relatively few enforced other biosecurity measures on visitors (0.4 +/- 0.1% required feed-delivery personnel and livestock handlers to shower before entering the premises; 3.3+/- 0.9% required a footbath; and 7.0 +/- 1.5% required feed-delivery personnel and livestock handlers not to have visited another operation with pigs on that day). The most common method of waste storage (used by 49.9 +/- 3.8% of operations with > or = 300 finisher pigs) was below-floor slurry or deep pit.
美国农业部的国家动物健康监测系统1995年全国猪研究旨在估算美国养猪场的管理、健康和生产参数。该研究涵盖了16个主要的生猪生产州,这些州占1995年6月1日生猪存栏量的近91%,以及美国近四分之三的生猪生产者。在研究的初始阶段,国家农业统计局的普查员从1477名参与生猪生产各阶段(产仔、保育和育肥)的生产者那里收集了信息。其中,405家存栏育肥猪≥300头(至少有一头育肥猪≥54千克)的养殖场参与了研究的后续部分,该部分涉及州和联邦兽医官员以及动物健康技术人员的农场访问,重点关注育肥阶段的生产。在有资格参与研究第二阶段的养殖场中,独立生产者的参与率(48.3%)高于合同生产者(15.3%)。使用先进记录保存系统(如个体种猪记录卡或基于计算机的记录保存系统)的养殖场的参与率也更高。因此,研究结果可能受到了回应偏差的影响。作为一项生物安全措施,40.5±2.1%的养殖场只限制员工进入。对于允许非员工进入养殖场的情况,相对较少的养殖场对访客实施其他生物安全措施(0.4±0.1%要求饲料运输人员和牲畜处理人员在进入养殖场前淋浴;3.3±0.9%要求设置脚浴;7.0±1.5%要求饲料运输人员和牲畜处理人员当天不得去过另一个有猪的养殖场)。最常见的粪便储存方法(≥300头育肥猪的养殖场中有49.9±3.8%使用)是地下泥浆或深坑储存。