Suppr超能文献

刺激包络和精细结构对双耳掩蔽级差的影响。

The influence of stimulus envelope and fine structure on the binaural masking level difference.

作者信息

Eddins D A, Barber L E

机构信息

Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405, USA.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 May;103(5 Pt 1):2578-89. doi: 10.1121/1.423112.

Abstract

A masking level difference (MLD) paradigm was used to investigate the influence of stimulus envelope and stimulus fine-structure characteristics on monaural and binaural hearing. The degree of masker envelope fluctuation was manipulated by selecting narrow-band noises (50 Hz) on a continuum of values of the normalized fourth moment of the envelope. The noises were specified as low-noise noise (LNN), medium-noise noise (MNN), and high-noise noise (HNN). Fine-structure cues were studied by measuring thresholds at 500 and 4000 Hz, regions in which the availability of such cues to the auditory system differ substantially. In addition, thresholds were measured for Gaussian noise maskers (GN) and for maskers having a flat magnitude spectrum, termed equal-magnitude noise (EMN) maskers. The results indicated lower NoSo thresholds for LNN than for the other four masker types. Furthermore, there were no differences in threshold for maskers having moderate and high degrees of envelope fluctuation (MNN and HNN). The NoS pi thresholds were not significantly different across masker type and were characterized by large individual differences among the seven listeners. The results are considered in relation to models of monaural and binaural processing. Consistent with previous reports, the results indicate that binaural detection depends on interaural differences in the stimulus envelope and fine structure at low frequencies and changes in the envelope at high frequencies.

摘要

采用掩蔽级差(MLD)范式来研究刺激包络和刺激精细结构特征对单耳和双耳听力的影响。通过在包络归一化四阶矩的连续值上选择窄带噪声(50 Hz)来控制掩蔽器包络波动的程度。这些噪声被指定为低噪声噪声(LNN)、中噪声噪声(MNN)和高噪声噪声(HNN)。通过测量500 Hz和4000 Hz处的阈值来研究精细结构线索,在这些区域中,听觉系统对这些线索的可利用性有很大差异。此外,还测量了高斯噪声掩蔽器(GN)和具有平坦幅度谱的掩蔽器(称为等幅度噪声(EMN)掩蔽器)的阈值。结果表明,LNN的NoSo阈值低于其他四种掩蔽器类型。此外,具有中等和高度包络波动(MNN和HNN)的掩蔽器在阈值上没有差异。NoS pi阈值在不同掩蔽器类型之间没有显著差异,并且在七名听众中存在很大的个体差异。结合单耳和双耳处理模型对结果进行了考虑。与先前的报告一致,结果表明双耳检测取决于低频时刺激包络和精细结构的双耳差异以及高频时包络的变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验