Suppr超能文献

患者对不同类型贴面修复体的满意度。

patients' satisfaction with different types of veneer restorations.

作者信息

Meijering A C, Roeters F J, Mulder J, Creugers N H

机构信息

Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, TRIKON: Institute for Dental Clinical Research, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Dent. 1997 Nov;25(6):493-7. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00067-x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to measure the satisfaction of patients with respect to the aesthetics of veneer restorations (VRs) and to identify potential factors influencing their satisfaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and eighty VRs of three different types (direct composite, indirect composite and porcelain) were placed on anterior teeth. Patients were asked to fill in questionnaires at baseline and at one- and two-year recalls.

RESULTS

At baseline the overall satisfaction was 76%, after two years this was 78%. The variable 'type of VR' was the only factor measured that had a significant influence on the satisfaction of the patient. At the two-year evaluation patients with porcelain VRs were more satisfied than those with direct composite VRs (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

From the results of this study it is concluded that differences in clinical procedures had no effect on satisfaction. Also the number of VRs had not influenced the level of satisfaction. After two years a significant difference was observed for the variable 'type of VR', with the best results for porcelain.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在衡量患者对贴面修复体(VR)美学效果的满意度,并确定影响其满意度的潜在因素。

材料与方法

将180个三种不同类型(直接复合树脂、间接复合树脂和瓷质)的VR放置在前牙上。要求患者在基线时以及一年和两年回访时填写问卷。

结果

基线时总体满意度为76%,两年后为78%。“VR类型”变量是所测量的唯一对患者满意度有显著影响的因素。在两年评估时,瓷质VR患者比直接复合树脂VR患者更满意(P < 0.05)。

结论

从本研究结果得出,临床操作差异对满意度没有影响。VR的数量也未影响满意度水平。两年后观察到“VR类型”变量存在显著差异,瓷质的效果最佳。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验