Suppr超能文献

口服普罗帕酮治疗婴幼儿心律失常的安全性(欧洲回顾性多中心研究)。欧洲儿科心脏病学家协会儿科心律失常与电生理学工作组

Safety of oral propafenone in the treatment of arrhythmias in infants and children (European retrospective multicenter study). Working Group on Pediatric Arrhythmias and Electrophysiology of the Association of European Pediatric Cardiologists.

作者信息

Janousek J, Paul T

机构信息

Kardiocentrum, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1998 May 1;81(9):1121-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(98)00142-8.

Abstract

This study was designed to assess adverse effects of oral propafenone in a large number of pediatric patients. Retrospective data from 27 European centers covering 772 patients treated with oral propafenone were analyzed. The following arrhythmias were treated: reentrant supraventricular tachycardia in 388 patients, atrial ectopic tachycardia in 66, junctional ectopic tachycardia in 39, atrial flutter in 21, ventricular premature complexes in 140, ventricular tachycardia in 78, and other arrhythmias in 39 patients. Two hundred forty-nine patients (32.3%) had structural heart disease. Significant electrophysiologic side effects and proarrhythmia were found in 15 of 772 patients (1.9%): sinus node dysfunction in 4, complete atrioventricular block in 2, aggravation of supraventricular tachycardia in 2, acceleration of ventricular rate during atrial flutter in 1, ventricular proarrhythmia in 5, and unexplained syncope in 1 patient. Cardiac arrest or sudden death occurred in 5 of 772 patients (0.6%): 2 patients had supraventricular tachycardia due to the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and a normal heart; the remaining 3 patients had structural heart disease. Overall, adverse cardiac events were more common in the presence (12 of 249 patients, 4.8%) than in the absence (8 of 523 patients, 1.5%) of structural heart disease (p <0.01). There was no difference between patients treated for supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Thus, propafenone is a relatively safe drug for the treatment of several pediatric tachyarrhythmias. Proarrhythmic effects seem to be less frequent than those reported for encainide or flecainide and occur predominantly in patients with structural heart disease.

摘要

本研究旨在评估口服普罗帕酮对大量儿科患者的不良反应。分析了来自27个欧洲中心的回顾性数据,这些数据涵盖了772例接受口服普罗帕酮治疗的患者。治疗的心律失常包括:388例折返性室上性心动过速、66例房性异位性心动过速、39例交界性异位性心动过速、21例心房扑动、140例室性早搏、78例室性心动过速以及39例其他心律失常。249例患者(32.3%)患有结构性心脏病。在772例患者中有15例(1.9%)出现了显著的电生理副作用和促心律失常:4例窦房结功能障碍、2例完全性房室传导阻滞、2例室上性心动过速加重、1例心房扑动时心室率加速、5例室性促心律失常以及1例不明原因的晕厥。772例患者中有5例(0.6%)发生心脏骤停或猝死:2例因预激综合征且心脏正常而患有室上性心动过速;其余3例患有结构性心脏病。总体而言,结构性心脏病患者中不良心脏事件更为常见(249例患者中有12例,4.8%),而非结构性心脏病患者中则较少见(523例患者中有8例,1.5%)(p<0.01)。治疗室上性和室性心律失常的患者之间没有差异。因此,普罗帕酮是治疗几种儿科快速性心律失常的相对安全的药物。促心律失常作用似乎比恩卡尼或氟卡尼报道的要少见,且主要发生在患有结构性心脏病的患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验