Suppr超能文献

宝宝是不是太热了?澳大利亚维多利亚州婴儿衣物、床上用品及家庭供暖情况

Is baby too warm? The use of infant clothing, bedding and home heating in Victoria, Australia.

作者信息

Watson L, Potter A, Gallucci R, Lumley J

机构信息

Centre for the Study of Mothers' and Children's Health, La Trobe University, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Early Hum Dev. 1998 May 29;51(2):93-107. doi: 10.1016/s0378-3782(97)00085-6.

Abstract

Overheating of infants has been associated with a raised risk for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Data on the use of heating, bedding and clothing and other measures affecting the thermal environment of 4 week old infants were collected at a home interview for infants of women born in Australia (Anglo-Celtic background), in Southern Europe, in Asia and of women who had a planned out-of-hospital birth. These groups have different risks of SIDS not explained by the classic social and perinatal risk factors nor associated with the currently promoted 'new' risk factors. Thermal insulation of the infant's bedding and clothing and excess thermal insulation (for any observed room temperature) were calculated. Bed sharing differed significantly between the groups as did the use of a sheepskin, tucking in firmly, the closing of doors and windows and the use of heating in the infant's room. After stratifying by bed sharing practice and season of interview, it was found that bed sharing infants had more thermal insulation than those sleeping alone irrespective of season of interview. Infants sleeping alone in the Asian-born and Southern European-born groups were kept warmer than infants in the other two groups. Cultural factors appear to affect the thermal environment in which infants are raised. Some bed sharing infants in all four groups were inappropriately warm, particularly in colder weather, but this was more likely in the Asian-born (low risk) group than in the home birth (high risk) group. These results do not explain the differences in SIDS incidence between the groups.

摘要

婴儿过热与婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)风险升高有关。在对出生于澳大利亚(盎格鲁 - 凯尔特背景)、南欧、亚洲的女性所生婴儿以及计划在家外分娩的女性所生婴儿进行的家访中,收集了有关4周龄婴儿使用取暖设备、床上用品、衣物及其他影响热环境措施的数据。这些群体的SIDS风险不同,无法用经典的社会和围产期风险因素来解释,也与当前所倡导的“新”风险因素无关。计算了婴儿床上用品和衣物的保暖性以及过度保暖情况(针对任何观察到的室温)。不同群体之间,同睡一张床的情况、使用羊皮、裹紧被子、关闭门窗以及在婴儿房间使用取暖设备的情况均存在显著差异。按同睡一张床的习惯和访谈季节进行分层后发现,无论访谈季节如何,同睡一张床的婴儿比独自睡觉的婴儿保暖性更强。在亚洲出生和南欧出生的群体中,独自睡觉的婴儿比其他两组的婴儿保暖性更好。文化因素似乎会影响婴儿成长的热环境。所有四个群体中,一些同睡一张床的婴儿保暖过度,尤其是在较冷的天气,但这种情况在亚洲出生(低风险)群体中比在家外分娩(高风险)群体中更常见。这些结果无法解释不同群体之间SIDS发病率的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验