Iskandar B J, McLaughlin C, Mapstone T B, Grabb P A, Oakes W J
Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA.
Pediatrics. 1998 Jun;101(6):1031-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.6.1031.
The diagnosis of shunt malfunction can be difficult even for the experienced clinician and may lead to disastrous circumstances when misinterpreted. Less experienced physicians may rely more on radiographic reports as a primary diagnostic modality. In this study, we evaluated the reliability of using these reports without accurate clinical assessment.
All shunt revisions seen at Children's Hospital (Birmingham, AL) between January 1996 and August 1996 were reviewed, excluding patients with brain tumors, supratentorial extraaxial fluid collections, and infections. Sixty-eight patients underwent 100 operations for shunt malfunction. All patients had evidence of shunt blockage, disconnection, catheter malposition, or valve pressure incompatibility. The prospective radiographic interpretation of preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans was reviewed in each case.
Twenty-four percent of the reports made no mention of shunt malfunction. In this group, the ventricular system was described as "unchanged," "stable," "normal," "unremarkable," "small," "smaller," "slit," "negative," and "no hydrocephalus," with no other comment to support a diagnosis of shunt malfunction. An additional 9% of reports contained the same terms, while also hinting at some other clinical or radiographic data that suggest the possibility of shunt failure (e.g., a shunt disconnection seen on plain radiographs), despite the scan findings. In all patients in this group, symptoms improved after surgery.
We conclude that as many as one third of patients presenting with shunt malfunction will not have the diagnosis of shunt malfunction supported by a prospective radiologic interpretation of brain imaging. Although the neurosurgical community can assess the clinical situation to determine the need for surgery, other clinicians can be easily reassured by a radiographic report that does not mention or diagnose shunt malfunction. Today, more than ever, nonneurosurgeons are being called on to evaluate complex clinical situations and may rely on radiographic reports.
即使对于经验丰富的临床医生而言,分流器故障的诊断也可能存在困难,若解读有误可能会导致灾难性后果。经验不足的医生可能更依赖影像学报告作为主要诊断方式。在本研究中,我们评估了在没有准确临床评估的情况下使用这些报告的可靠性。
回顾了1996年1月至1996年8月在阿拉巴马州伯明翰市儿童医院进行的所有分流器修复手术,排除患有脑肿瘤、幕上脑外积液和感染的患者。68例患者因分流器故障接受了100次手术。所有患者均有分流器堵塞、断开、导管位置不当或瓣膜压力不匹配的证据。对每例患者术前计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像扫描的前瞻性影像学解读进行了回顾。
24%的报告未提及分流器故障。在这组报告中,脑室系统被描述为“无变化”“稳定”“正常”“无异常”“小”“更小”“裂隙状”“阴性”和“无脑积水”,且没有其他支持分流器故障诊断的说明。另外9%的报告包含相同表述,同时还暗示了一些其他临床或影像学数据,提示存在分流器故障的可能性(例如,平片上可见分流器断开),尽管扫描结果显示并非如此。该组所有患者术后症状均有改善。
我们得出结论,多达三分之一出现分流器故障的患者,其分流器故障的诊断无法通过对脑部成像的前瞻性影像学解读得到支持。虽然神经外科领域可以评估临床情况以确定是否需要手术,但其他临床医生可能会因未提及或诊断分流器故障的影像学报告而轻易放心。如今,非神经外科医生比以往任何时候都更常被要求评估复杂的临床情况,并且可能依赖影像学报告。