• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

准分子激光角膜切削术后中央角膜厚度变化对眼压测量值的校正

Correction of intraocular pressure for changes in central corneal thickness following photorefractive keratectomy.

作者信息

Munger R, Hodge W G, Mintsioulis G, Agapitos P J, Jackson W B, Damji K F

机构信息

University of Ottawa Eye Institute, Ottawa General Hospital, Ont.

出版信息

Can J Ophthalmol. 1998 Apr;33(3):159-65.

PMID:9606572
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relation between measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) in myopic patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

DESIGN

Descriptive study.

SETTING

University-affiliated eye care centre in Ottawa.

PATIENTS

A total of 481 consecutive eyes of 318 patients with a mean preoperative refractive error of -6.50 dioptres treated with excimer PRK between March 1993 and December 1996.

OUTCOME MEASURES

IOP measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and CCT before and 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery.

RESULTS

CCT was a significant predictor of IOP only before PRK and 6 months after PRK (p < or = 0.05). The relation between IOP and CCT suggests corrections for CCT that are not clinically significant (0.81 mm Hg [standard error (SE) 0.33 mm Hg] and 1.00 mm Hg [SE 0.38 mm Hg] per 100 microns of corneal thinning preoperatively and at 6 months respectively). On average, there was a significant decrease in IOP after PRK (0.96 mm Hg and 1.24 mm Hg at 12 and 24 months respectively) (p < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between change in IOP and change in CCT (decrease of 2.1 mm Hg per 100 microns of corneal thinning) (p < 0.05). For a given change in CCT, individual changes in IOP were variable, with increases or decreases of more than 5 mm Hg in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

There are individual differences in IOP changes following PRK. Until further data are available we propose that the change in IOP between the preoperative visit (or the fellow eye, if healthy or untreated) and the 12-month visit be used as an individual correction factor to be applied to IOP measurements in the operated eye.

摘要

目的

探讨接受准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(PRK)的近视患者眼内压(IOP)测量值与中央角膜厚度(CCT)之间的关系。

设计

描述性研究。

地点

渥太华大学附属眼科护理中心。

患者

1993年3月至1996年12月期间,318例患者共481只连续的眼睛接受了准分子PRK治疗,术前平均屈光不正为-6.50屈光度。

观察指标

术前及术后3、6、12、18和24个月通过Goldmann压平眼压计测量IOP,并测量CCT。

结果

仅在PRK术前和术后6个月,CCT是IOP的显著预测因素(p≤0.05)。IOP与CCT之间的关系提示,对CCT的校正无临床显著意义(术前和6个月时,每100微米角膜变薄分别为0.81 mmHg[标准误差(SE)0.33 mmHg]和1.00 mmHg[SE 0.38 mmHg])。平均而言,PRK术后IOP显著降低(12个月和24个月时分别为0.96 mmHg和1.24 mmHg)(p<0.05)。IOP变化与CCT变化之间存在显著相关性(每100微米角膜变薄IOP降低2.1 mmHg)(p<0.05)。对于CCT的给定变化,个体IOP变化存在差异,某些情况下IOP升高或降低超过5 mmHg。

结论

PRK术后IOP变化存在个体差异。在获得更多数据之前,我们建议将术前访视(或健侧眼,如果健康或未治疗)与12个月访视之间的IOP变化用作个体校正因子,应用于患眼的IOP测量。

相似文献

1
Correction of intraocular pressure for changes in central corneal thickness following photorefractive keratectomy.准分子激光角膜切削术后中央角膜厚度变化对眼压测量值的校正
Can J Ophthalmol. 1998 Apr;33(3):159-65.
2
Factors that influence intraocular pressure changes after myopic and hyperopic LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a large population study.影响近视和远视 LASIK 及光折射性角膜切削术后眼内压变化的因素:一项大样本研究。
Ophthalmology. 2015 Mar;122(3):471-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.09.033. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
3
Underestimate of tonometric readings after photorefractive keratectomy increases at higher intraocular pressure levels.屈光性角膜切除术后眼压测量值的低估在较高眼压水平时会增加。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Sep;46(9):3208-13. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-1240.
4
Changes in measured intraocular pressure after hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy.远视性屈光性角膜切削术后测量眼压的变化。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001 Aug;27(8):1254-62. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)00971-3.
5
Tono-Pen versus Goldmann tonometry after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.准分子激光屈光性角膜切削术后眼压计与Goldmann眼压测量法的比较
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 Apr;25(4):486-91. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)80044-3.
6
[The relationship between central corneal thickness and Perkins applanation tonometry in rabbits].[兔眼角膜中央厚度与帕金斯压平眼压计测量值的关系]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2005 Jul;41(7):642-6.
7
Reliability of intraocular pressure measurements after myopic excimer photorefractive keratectomy.近视性准分子激光角膜切削术后眼压测量的可靠性
Ophthalmology. 1998 Dec;105(12):2193-6. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91215-5.
8
Tonometric changes of latanoprost-induced intraocular pressure reduction after photorefractive keratectomy.准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后拉坦前列素诱导的眼压降低的眼压变化
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Mar;45(3):846-50. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0625.
9
[Analysis of intraocular pressure after myopic photorefractive keratectomy].[近视性屈光性角膜切削术后眼压分析]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2002 Oct;38(10):603-5.
10
Intraocular pressure and photorefractive keratectomy: a comparison of three different tonometers.眼压与准分子激光角膜切削术:三种不同眼压计的比较
Cornea. 2001 Jan;20(1):33-6. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200101000-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
A Review on Different Tonometers for Intraocular Pressure Measurement After Photorefractive Keratectomy or Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.屈光性角膜切削术或小切口基质透镜切除术术后眼压测量中不同眼压计的综述
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 14;14:3305-3323. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S278167. eCollection 2020.
2
Reliability of Intraocular Pressure Measurement by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry After Refractive Surgery: A Review of Different Correction Formulas.屈光手术后Goldmann压平眼压测量法测量眼压的可靠性:不同校正公式综述
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 24;14:2783-2788. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S263856. eCollection 2020.
3
A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy.
光折射性角膜切削术后 Goldmann 压平眼压测量与动态轮廓眼压测量的比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;251(2):603-8. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2142-1. Epub 2012 Sep 2.
4
Measurement of intraocular pressure after LASIK by dynamic contour tonometry.通过动态轮廓眼压计测量准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术后的眼压。
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2006;26(3):372-3, 377. doi: 10.1007/BF02829580.