Olson A D, Hernandez R, Hirschl R B
Department of Pediatrics and Surgery, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0245, USA.
J Pediatr Surg. 1998 May;33(5):676-81. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90186-5.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The appropriate role for ultrasonography (US) as a replacement for the upper gastrointestinal series (UGI) in vomiting infants remains undefined. The authors have used decision analysis techniques to determine whether the use of ultrasonography as an initial screen in vomiting infants is cost effective when compared with the UGI as the only study.
Two diagnostic strategies were compared: 1) UGI alone and 2) ultrasonography followed by an UGI series in 50% of cases when ultrasonography scan was negative for pyloric stenosis. The test sensitivity (US, 0.9; UGI, 1.0) and test specificity (US, 1.0; UGI, 1.0) and the incidence of pyloric stenosis among vomiting infants presenting to the community pediatrician (0.30) or after a negative examination by an experienced examiner (0.02 to 0.18) were obtained from a review of the literature. The relative charges for ultrasonography and UGI were obtained from a national survey from which the cost ratio of US to UGI was estimated to range from 0.67 to 1.81 with a median of 1.06.
Under these baseline assumptions, UGI only was the preferred strategy. The results of the decision analysis were sensitive to, or dependent on, assumptions made regarding the incidence of pyloric stenosis, the US to UGI cost ratio, the sensitivity of the US, and the proportion of patients that proceed to UGI when the US scan was negative for pyloric stenosis. When at least 50% of patients whose US scan was negative for pyloric stenosis proceeded to a UGI, UGI remained the preferred strategy for all cost ratios examined (0.6 to 1.7). Even when no patients proceeded to UGI, the cost ratio of US to UGI had to be less than 0.7 under the typical incidence (0.30) of pyloric stenosis among vomiting infants presenting to the community pediatrician for US to be cost effective. Finally, only UGI was indicated when an olive was not appreciated by an experienced examiner.
Under assumptions that fit most clinically relevant circumstances, the UGI as the initial study is the most cost-effective radiological diagnostic test in the evaluation of the vomiting infant.
背景/目的:超声检查(US)替代上消化道造影(UGI)用于呕吐婴儿的恰当作用仍不明确。作者运用决策分析技术来确定,与仅采用UGI检查相比,将超声检查作为呕吐婴儿的初始筛查手段是否具有成本效益。
比较了两种诊断策略:1)仅采用UGI;2)超声检查,若超声扫描显示幽门狭窄阴性,则50%的病例随后进行UGI检查。通过文献回顾获取了检测敏感度(超声检查为0.9;UGI为1.0)、检测特异度(超声检查为1.0;UGI为1.0)以及社区儿科医生接诊的呕吐婴儿中幽门狭窄的发生率(0.30),或经验丰富的检查者检查结果为阴性后的发生率(0.02至0.18)。超声检查和UGI的相对费用来自一项全国性调查,据此估计超声检查与UGI的成本比在0.67至1.81之间,中位数为1.06。
在这些基线假设下,仅采用UGI是首选策略。决策分析的结果对关于幽门狭窄发生率、超声检查与UGI的成本比、超声检查的敏感度以及超声扫描显示幽门狭窄阴性时进行UGI检查的患者比例所做的假设敏感,或依赖于这些假设。当至少50%超声扫描显示幽门狭窄阴性的患者进行UGI检查时,对于所有检测的成本比(0.6至1.7),UGI仍然是首选策略。即使没有患者进行UGI检查,在社区儿科医生接诊的呕吐婴儿中幽门狭窄的典型发生率(0.30)情况下,超声检查与UGI的成本比必须小于0.7,超声检查才具有成本效益。最后,当经验丰富的检查者未触及橄榄样肿物时,仅需进行UGI检查。
在符合大多数临床相关情况的假设下,UGI作为初始检查是评估呕吐婴儿最具成本效益的放射学诊断检查。