Rajs J, Lundström M, Broberg M, Lidberg L, Lindquist O
Department of Forensic Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Forensic Sci. 1998 May;43(3):563-80.
During the 30-year period 1961-1990, a total of 22 deaths with criminal multilation/dismemberment of the human body were registered in Sweden. The multilations occurred in time clusters, mostly during the summer and winter periods, and increased during the three decades, with incidence rates of 0.05, 0.1, and 0.125 per million inhabitants and year, respectively. Multilation was noted 6.6 times more often in large urban areas than in the rest of Sweden. Defensive mutilation, in order to get rid of the corpse or make its identity more difficult, was noted in ten instances, aggressive mutilation following outrageous overkilling in four, offensive mutilation (lust murder) in seven, and necromanic multilation in one instance. In the last-mentioned case the cause of death was natural, while all deaths in the first three groups were homicidal, or homicide was strongly suspected. All perpetrators were males, in six instances assisted by other persons. In more than half of the cases the perpetrator's occupation was associated with application of anatomical knowledge, e.g., butcher, physician, veterinary assistant, or hunter. The perpetrators of the defensive and aggressive mutilations were mostly disorganized, i.e., alcoholics or drug users with previous psychiatric contacts and criminal histories, while the lust murderers were mostly organized, with a history of violent crimes (including the "serial killing" type), drug abuse and mental disorders with anxiety and schizophrenia, in that order to a diminishing degree. There were differences in mode of mutilation, depending on whether the mutilation was carried out by a layman, a butcher, or a physician. In only one case was the perpetrator convicted for the mutilation act itself; in the remaining instances the manslaughter, as a more serious crime, assimilated the mutilation. When the mutilation made it impossible to establish the cause of death, the perpetrators, despite strong circumstantial evidence indicating murder, were acquitted.
在1961年至1990年的30年期间,瑞典共登记了22起涉及对人体进行残忍肢解/分尸的死亡案件。这些肢解事件呈现出时间上的聚集性,大多发生在夏季和冬季,并且在这三十年中呈上升趋势,每百万居民每年的发生率分别为0.05、0.1和0.125。在瑞典大城市地区,肢解事件的发生率比其他地区高出6.6倍。发现有十起案件是为了处理尸体或增加辨认尸体身份的难度而进行的防御性肢解,四起案件是在极其残忍的过度杀戮后进行的攻击性肢解,七起案件是攻击性肢解(色欲谋杀),还有一起是恋尸性肢解。在最后提到的案件中,死因是自然死亡,而前三组中的所有死亡均为他杀,或被强烈怀疑为他杀。所有犯罪者均为男性,其中六起案件有他人协助。在一半以上的案件中,犯罪者的职业与解剖学知识的应用有关,例如屠夫、医生、兽医助理或猎人。进行防御性和攻击性肢解的犯罪者大多行为无组织,即酗酒者或吸毒者,此前有过精神科就诊记录和犯罪史,而色欲谋杀者大多行为有组织,有暴力犯罪(包括“连环杀人”类型)、药物滥用以及焦虑症和精神分裂症等精神障碍病史,且程度依次递减。根据肢解行为是由外行、屠夫还是医生实施,肢解方式存在差异。只有一起案件的犯罪者因肢解行为本身被定罪;在其余案件中,作为更严重罪行的过失杀人罪包含了肢解行为。当肢解行为导致无法确定死因时,尽管有强有力的间接证据表明是谋杀,但犯罪者仍被宣告无罪。