Suppr超能文献

A comparison of intubation success for paediatric transport team paramedics using lighted vs regular tracheal tube stylets.

作者信息

MacNab A J, MacPhail I, MacNab M K, Noble R, O'Flaherty D

机构信息

Pediatric Transport Program, British Columbia's Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Paediatr Anaesth. 1998;8(3):215-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.1998.00742.x.

Abstract

We conducted a prospective randomized study of success rate and time to intubation using Trachlight and Surch-Lite lighted stylets versus a regular tracheal tube stylet, in a training setting. Participants, 18 paediatric transport paramedics, performed two intubations with each of the three devices, using an airway management trainer. There was no significant difference in mean time for intubation between the three devices. The times for external confirmation of correct tube placement were comparable using the two lighted stylets. External confirmation of the tube placement using the lighted stylets was quicker than laryngoscopic visualization. In darkness, with a nonfunctioning laryngoscope, intubations were successfully performed 100% of the time with the lighted stylet, but only 11% of the time with the regular stylet. All paramedics felt that a lighted stylet would be a useful airway management adjunct for the transport environment for complicated intubations or for use in very high or low levels of ambient light.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验