Hollabaugh R S, Dmochowski R R, Kneib T G, Steiner M S
Department of Urology, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee, Memphis 38163, USA.
Urology. 1998 Jun;51(6):960-7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00128-9.
Urinary incontinence is a significant complication of radical pelvic surgery. A better understanding of the neuroanatomy of the rhabdosphincter has led to the modification of the radical retropubic prostatectomy to optimize the recovery of postoperative urinary control.
Mock radical retropubic prostatectomy was performed on fresh cadavers to determine which surgical maneuvers could injure what may be the continence nerves. To assess the clinical significance of modifying the radical retropubic prostatectomy based on these anatomic studies, a contemporary series of 60 consecutive patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy with continence nerve preservation was compared with a control group of 38 consecutive patients who had a standard anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy.
At the level of the prostatic apex, both the pelvic and pudendal nerves gave intrapelvic branches that bilaterally coursed to the external urinary sphincter to enter at the 5 and 7 o'clock positions. The mock radical prostatectomy revealed that the nerves to the external urinary sphincter were most prone to injury when a right angle clamp was used to develop a plane between the posterior rhabdosphincter and anterior rectum and if the urethral anastomotic sutures were placed at the 5 and 7 o'clock positions. In addition, blunt dissection of the tips of the seminal vesicles injured the inferior hypogastric plexus. Modifications to preserve the continence nerves were incorporated in the anatomic radical prostatectomy. Although overall continence rates were similar for the two groups (98.3% for continence nerve-preserving radical prostatectomy versus 92. 1% for standard prostatectomy), continence nerve preservation decreased the time to achieve continence.
During radical retropubic prostatectomy, surgical maneuvers that avoid injury to the continence nerves resulted in the more rapid return of urinary control.
尿失禁是根治性盆腔手术的一个重要并发症。对尿道括约肌神经解剖学的深入了解促使对耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术进行改良,以优化术后排尿控制的恢复。
在新鲜尸体上进行模拟耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术,以确定哪些手术操作可能损伤可能是控尿神经的结构。为了评估基于这些解剖学研究对耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术进行改良的临床意义,将当代连续60例行耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术并保留控尿神经的患者与38例行标准解剖性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术的连续患者组成的对照组进行比较。
在前列腺尖水平,盆腔神经和阴部神经均发出盆腔内分支,双侧走向尿道外括约肌并在5点和7点位置进入。模拟根治性前列腺切除术显示,当使用直角钳在尿道后括约肌和直肠前部之间分离平面,以及如果尿道吻合缝线置于5点和7点位置时,尿道外括约肌的神经最容易受损。此外,钝性分离精囊尖端会损伤下腹下丛。在解剖性根治性前列腺切除术中纳入了保留控尿神经的改良措施。虽然两组的总体控尿率相似(保留控尿神经的根治性前列腺切除术为98.3%,标准前列腺切除术为92.1%),但保留控尿神经缩短了实现控尿的时间。
在耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术中,避免损伤控尿神经的手术操作可使排尿控制更快恢复。