• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺钼靶摄影的诊断准确性是否取决于放射科医生的经验?

Does diagnostic accuracy in mammography depend on radiologists' experience?

作者信息

Elmore J G, Wells C K, Howard D H

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

J Womens Health. 1998 May;7(4):443-9. doi: 10.1089/jwh.1998.7.443.

DOI:10.1089/jwh.1998.7.443
PMID:9611702
Abstract

This study was designed to determine if radiologists' experience in mammography is associated with their performance in correctly interpreting mammograms. Study mammograms (n = 150) were chosen by stratified random sampling from those interpreted as normal, abnormal-benign or abnormal-suspicious for cancer, with oversampling of cancer cases. Ten radiologists who had varying amounts of experience were asked to read the mammograms. Associations between the levels of the radiologists' experience and their accuracy in reading mammograms were assessed. Significant associations (p < 0.05) were found between the frequency of immediate workup recommendations in cancer patients and obtaining feedback, total lifetime mammograms read, number of mammography continuing medical education (CME) credits, and practice type. Radiologists with more experience also noted smaller cancer lesions. However, these experience variables were also associated with increased workup recommendations in the noncancer patients (p < 0.10). In multivariable analysis, obtaining regular feedback and the total lifetime number of mammograms read were independently associate with the number of times immediate workup was recommended in the cancer cases. The most experienced radiologist had the highest sensitivity in diagnosing breast cancer. Further studies are needed to assess whether the current requirements of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for radiologists who read mammograms ensure acceptable levels of accuracy.

摘要

本研究旨在确定放射科医生的乳腺钼靶检查经验是否与其正确解读乳腺钼靶片的表现相关。通过分层随机抽样从解读为正常、良性异常或可疑癌症的乳腺钼靶片中选取研究用乳腺钼靶片(n = 150),对癌症病例进行了过度抽样。邀请了10位经验各异的放射科医生阅读这些乳腺钼靶片。评估了放射科医生的经验水平与其阅读乳腺钼靶片准确性之间的关联。在癌症患者中立即进行检查建议的频率与获得反馈、阅读的乳腺钼靶片总数量、乳腺钼靶继续医学教育(CME)学分数量以及执业类型之间发现了显著关联(p < 0.05)。经验更丰富的放射科医生还能发现更小的癌症病灶。然而,这些经验变量也与非癌症患者中更多的检查建议相关(p < 0.10)。在多变量分析中,获得定期反馈和阅读的乳腺钼靶片总数量与癌症病例中立即进行检查建议的次数独立相关。经验最丰富的放射科医生在诊断乳腺癌方面具有最高的敏感性。需要进一步研究来评估美国食品药品监督管理局对阅读乳腺钼靶片的放射科医生的当前要求是否能确保可接受的准确性水平。

相似文献

1
Does diagnostic accuracy in mammography depend on radiologists' experience?乳腺钼靶摄影的诊断准确性是否取决于放射科医生的经验?
J Womens Health. 1998 May;7(4):443-9. doi: 10.1089/jwh.1998.7.443.
2
Association between radiologists' experience and accuracy in interpreting screening mammograms.放射科医生解读乳腺筛查钼靶X线片的经验与准确性之间的关联。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Apr 25;8:91. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-91.
3
Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms.放射科医生对乳房X光片解读的差异。
N Engl J Med. 1994 Dec 1;331(22):1493-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199412013312206.
4
Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.筛查性乳房 X 光摄影中的解释性能的可变性和与准确性相关的放射科医生的特征。
Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):641-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2533082308. Epub 2009 Oct 28.
5
Effect of radiologists' diagnostic work-up volume on interpretive performance.放射科医生的诊断检查工作量对解读表现的影响。
Radiology. 2014 Nov;273(2):351-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14132806. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
6
When radiologists perform best: the learning curve in screening mammogram interpretation.当放射科医生表现最佳时:筛查性乳房 X 光照片解读的学习曲线。
Radiology. 2009 Dec;253(3):632-40. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2533090070. Epub 2009 Sep 29.
7
Radiologist interpretive volume and breast cancer screening accuracy in a Canadian organized screening program.放射科医生的解读量与加拿大有组织筛查项目中乳腺癌筛查的准确性。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Mar;106(3):djt461. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt461. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
8
Association of volume and volume-independent factors with accuracy in screening mammogram interpretation.乳房X线筛查影像解读中容积及非容积因素与准确性的关联
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Feb 19;95(4):282-90. doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.4.282.
9
Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists.根据放射科医生的特征评估乳腺钼靶筛查解读的准确性。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Dec 15;96(24):1840-50. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh333.
10
Radiologists' performance and their enjoyment of interpreting screening mammograms.放射科医生解读乳腺筛查钼靶影像的工作表现及体验。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Feb;192(2):361-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1647.

引用本文的文献

1
Reducing ' probably benign ' assessments in normal mammograms: The role of radiologist experience.减少正常乳房X光片中“可能良性”的评估:放射科医生经验的作用。
Eur J Radiol Open. 2023 Jun 14;10:100498. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100498. eCollection 2023.
2
Idiosyncratic biases in the perception of medical images.医学图像感知中的特质性偏差。
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 19;13:1049831. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1049831. eCollection 2022.
3
A machine learning model based on readers' characteristics to predict their performances in reading screening mammograms.
基于读者特征的机器学习模型,用于预测其阅读筛查性乳房 X 光片的表现。
Breast Cancer. 2022 Jul;29(4):589-598. doi: 10.1007/s12282-022-01335-3. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
4
Breast cancer detection across dense and non-dense breasts: Markers of diagnostic confidence and efficacy.致密型和非致密型乳腺的乳腺癌检测:诊断可信度和效能的标志物
Acta Radiol Open. 2022 Jan 29;11(1):20584601211072279. doi: 10.1177/20584601211072279. eCollection 2022 Jan.
5
The influence of breast density and key demographics of radiographers on mammography reporting performance - a pilot study.乳腺密度和放射技师关键人口统计学特征对乳腺 X 光摄影报告表现的影响——一项试点研究。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2022 Mar;69(1):30-36. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.486. Epub 2021 May 24.
6
Breast Cancer Diagnostic Efficacy in a Developing South-East Asian Country.东南亚一个发展中国家的乳腺癌诊断效能
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Mar 26;20(3):727-731. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.3.727.
7
Deep Learning to Distinguish Recalled but Benign Mammography Images in Breast Cancer Screening.深度学习在乳腺癌筛查中区分召回的良性乳腺 X 光图像。
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 1;24(23):5902-5909. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1115. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
8
Factors associated with breast screening radiologists' annual mammogram reading volume in Italy.与意大利乳腺筛查放射科医生年度乳房 X 光片阅读量相关的因素。
Radiol Med. 2016 Jul;121(7):557-63. doi: 10.1007/s11547-016-0631-8. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
9
Characterizing the Mammography Technologist Workforce in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州乳腺摄影技术人员队伍的特征分析。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Dec;12(12 Pt B):1419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.06.001.
10
Number of mammography cases read per year is a strong predictor of sensitivity.每年乳腺X线摄影病例的阅片数量是灵敏度的一个强有力预测指标。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2014 Apr;1(1):015503. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.1.1.015503. Epub 2014 May 7.