Suppr超能文献

创伤受害者中“分离性遗忘症”的有效性存疑。前瞻性研究的证据。

Questionable validity of 'dissociative amnesia' in trauma victims. Evidence from prospective studies.

作者信息

Pope H G, Hudson J I, Bodkin J A, Oliva P

机构信息

Biological Psychiatry Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA 02178, USA.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 1998 Mar;172:210-5; discussion 216-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.172.3.210.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We reviewed evidence from prospective studies to test whether individuals can develop amnesia for traumatic experiences, a process variously termed 'repression', 'dissociative amnesia' or 'psychogenic amnesia'.

METHOD

Using specified criteria, we selected and analysed studies which prospectively assessed memory in victims of documented traumatic experiences.

RESULTS

In studies in which people were asked directly about a past traumatic experience, they consistently reported memories. Non-reporting occurred only in studies where subjects were not asked directly about the experience. This latter design leaves open the well-documented possibility that subjects simply did not disclose events that they actually remembered. Some prospective studies were also limited by incomplete documentation of trauma and failure to rule out other more ordinary causes of amnesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective data as yet fail to demonstrate that individuals can develop dissociative amnesia for traumatic events.

摘要

背景

我们回顾了前瞻性研究的证据,以检验个体是否会对创伤性经历产生失忆,这一过程有多种称谓,如“压抑”“分离性失忆”或“心因性失忆”。

方法

我们使用特定标准,挑选并分析了前瞻性评估有记录的创伤性经历受害者记忆的研究。

结果

在那些直接询问人们过去创伤性经历的研究中,他们始终报告有记忆。只有在未直接询问受试者该经历的研究中才出现未报告的情况。后一种设计存在一种有充分记录的可能性,即受试者只是没有透露他们实际记得的事件。一些前瞻性研究还受到创伤记录不完整以及未能排除其他更常见失忆原因的限制。

结论

前瞻性数据尚未证明个体能够对创伤性事件产生分离性失忆。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验