Stashuk D, Paoli G M
Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 1998 Jan;36(1):75-82. doi: 10.1007/BF02522861.
A certainty-based classification algorithm is described, which comprises part of a clinically used EMG signal decomposition system. This algorithm classifies a candidate motor unit action potential (MUAP) to the motor unit potential trian (MUAPT) that produces the greatest estimated certainty, provided this maximal certainty is above a given threshold. The algorithm is iterative, such that the certainty with which assignments are made increases with each pass through the data, and it has specific stopping criteria. The performance and sensitivity (to the assignment threshold) of the Certainty algorithm and an iterative minimum Euclidean distance (MED) algorithm are compared by classifying sets of MUAPs detected in real concentric needle-detected EMG signals, using a range of assignment thresholds for each algorithm. With regard to MUAP assignment and error rates, the Certainty algorithm consistently provides better mean results and, more importantly, less variable results than the MED algorithm. The Certainty algorithm can provide mean assignment and error rates of 80.8 and 1.5%, respectively, with a maximum error rate of 3.2%; the MED algorithm can provide mean assignment and error rates of 80.3 and 3.3%, respectively, with a maximum error rate of 6.5%. The Certainty algorithm is relatively insensitive to the certainty threshold used, can consistently differentiate between similarly shaped MUAPs from different MUAPTs, and can make correct classifications despite biological shape variability, background noise and signal shape nonstationarity.
描述了一种基于确定性的分类算法,它是临床使用的肌电图(EMG)信号分解系统的一部分。该算法将候选运动单位动作电位(MUAP)分类到产生最大估计确定性的运动单位电位序列(MUAPT),前提是这个最大确定性高于给定阈值。该算法是迭代的,使得每次遍历数据时进行分配的确定性都会增加,并且它有特定的停止标准。通过对在实际同心针电极检测的EMG信号中检测到的MUAP集合进行分类,使用每种算法的一系列分配阈值,比较了确定性算法和迭代最小欧几里得距离(MED)算法的性能和灵敏度(对分配阈值)。关于MUAP分配和错误率,确定性算法始终提供比MED算法更好的平均结果,更重要的是,结果的变异性更小。确定性算法可以分别提供平均分配率和错误率为80.8%和1.5%,最大错误率为3.2%;MED算法可以分别提供平均分配率和错误率为80.3%和3.3%,最大错误率为6.5%。确定性算法对所使用的确定性阈值相对不敏感,可以始终区分来自不同MUAPT的形状相似的MUAP,并且尽管存在生物形状变异性、背景噪声和信号形状非平稳性,仍能做出正确分类。