Hill A T, Hopkinson R B, Stableforth D E
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, U.K.
Respir Med. 1998 Feb;92(2):156-61. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(98)90088-9.
The aims of the study were to look at information on which the decision to ventilate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ITU) was based (including whether there was discussion with the patient, relatives and consultant), to identify indicators of poor prognosis, and to assess the outcomes of ventilation and functional capacity after discharge. A retrospective study of 27 months of admissions was carried out. The following variables were studied to see if they influenced prognosis: premorbid history, admission diagnosis, consultant involvement in the decision to transfer to ITU, admission chest radiograph, sputum bacteriology, arterial blood gases, APACHE II scores, duration of ventilation and complications in ITU. In-hospital mortality, post-discharge mortality and length of hospital stay were recorded. Functional capacity after discharge was assessed from the hospital clinic records and from general practitioners. Forty-six percent of case notes had inadequate premorbid information and no documented discussion occurred in 66% of patients/relatives. Poor prognostic indicators were admissions after cardiorespiratory arrest, cases discussed with consultants regarding ITU transfer, previous therapy with long-term oral steroids, and developing renal or cardiac failure in ITU. APACHE II scores were higher in the group that died. There was 49% hospital mortality and 59% 1-year mortality. Fifty-three percent of survivors were dependent upon carers and housebound, and general practitioners felt that 59% of survivors had a higher dependence on carers, a worse exercise tolerance and a poorer quality of life than before admission. The decision to ventilate is often made with inadequate background history, which could be sought from general practitioners, hospital case notes and family. There is significant morbidity and mortality following ventilation. Further prospective studies are required to help select which COPD patients should be ventilated.
本研究的目的是查看决定对入住重症监护病房(ITU)的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者进行通气治疗所依据的信息(包括是否与患者、亲属及会诊医生进行了讨论),确定预后不良的指标,并评估通气治疗的效果以及出院后的功能能力。对27个月的入院病例进行了回顾性研究。研究了以下变量,以观察它们是否影响预后:病前病史、入院诊断、会诊医生参与转至ITU的决策情况、入院时胸部X光片、痰细菌学检查、动脉血气分析、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)评分、通气持续时间以及在ITU发生的并发症。记录了住院死亡率、出院后死亡率和住院时间。出院后的功能能力通过医院门诊记录和全科医生进行评估。46%的病例记录病前信息不足,66%的患者/亲属未进行书面讨论。预后不良的指标包括心肺骤停后入院、就转至ITU与会诊医生讨论的病例、既往长期口服类固醇治疗以及在ITU发生肾衰竭或心力衰竭。死亡组的APACHE II评分更高。住院死亡率为49%,1年死亡率为59%。53%的幸存者需要照料者照顾且足不出户,全科医生认为59%的幸存者对比入院前对照料者的依赖程度更高、运动耐量更差且生活质量更差。进行通气治疗的决策往往在背景病史不充分的情况下做出,而这些病史可从全科医生、医院病例记录和家庭中获取。通气治疗后存在显著的发病率和死亡率。需要进一步开展前瞻性研究,以帮助选择哪些COPD患者应接受通气治疗。