Nava S
Respiratory Intensive Care Unit, Centro Medico di Montescano, S. Maugeri Foundation, Italy.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Jul;79(7):849-54. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90369-0.
Pulmonary rehabilitation has been shown to be of benefit to clinically stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study examined the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on some physiologic variables in COPD patients recovering from an episode of acute respiratory failure.
A prospective, randomized study.
A respiratory intensive care unit (RICU).
Eighty COPD patients recovering from an episode of acute respiratory failure were randomized in a 3:1 fashion to receive stepwise pulmonary rehabilitation (group A, n=60 patients) or standard medical therapy (group B, n=20 patients).
Improvements in exercise tolerance, sense of breathlessness, respiratory muscle function, and pulmonary function test values were measured, respectively, by exercise capacity (6-minute walking distance [6MWD]), dyspnea score (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]), maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and forced vital capacity (FVC).
Group A received pulmonary rehabilitation that consisted of passive mobilization (step I), early deambulation (step II), respiratory and lower skeletal muscle training (step III), and if the patients were able, complete lower extremity training on a treadmill (step IV). Group B received standard medical therapy plus a basic deambulation program.
Sixty-one of 80 patients were mechanically ventilated at admission to the unit and most of them were bedridden. Twelve of the 60 group A patients and 4 of the 20 group B patients died during their RICU stay, and 9 patients required invasive mechanical ventilation at home after their discharge. The total length of RICU stay was 38+/-14 days for patients in group A versus 33.2+/-11 days for those in group B. Most patients from both groups regained the ability to walk, either unaided or aided. At discharge, 6 MWD results were significantly improved (p < .001) in Group A only. MIP improved in Group A only (p < .05), while VAS scores improved in both groups, but the improvement was more marked in group A (p < .001) than in group B (p < .05).
COPD patients who were admitted to a RICU in critical condition after an episode of acute respiratory failure and who, in most cases, required mechanical ventilation benefited from comprehensive early pulmonary rehabilitation, compared with patients who received standard medical therapy and progressive ambulation.
肺康复已被证明对临床稳定的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者有益。本研究探讨了肺康复对从急性呼吸衰竭发作中恢复的COPD患者某些生理变量的影响。
一项前瞻性随机研究。
呼吸重症监护病房(RICU)。
80例从急性呼吸衰竭发作中恢复的COPD患者按3:1的比例随机分组,接受逐步肺康复治疗(A组,n = 60例患者)或标准药物治疗(B组,n = 20例患者)。
分别通过运动能力(6分钟步行距离[6MWD])、呼吸困难评分(视觉模拟量表[VAS])、最大吸气压力(MIP)、第1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和用力肺活量(FVC)来测量运动耐量、呼吸困难感、呼吸肌功能和肺功能测试值的改善情况。
A组接受包括被动活动(第一步)、早期下床活动(第二步)、呼吸和下肢骨骼肌训练(第三步)的肺康复治疗,若患者能够耐受,还进行跑步机上的完整下肢训练(第四步)。B组接受标准药物治疗加基本的下床活动计划。
80例患者中有61例入院时接受机械通气,且大多数卧床不起。60例A组患者中有12例、20例B组患者中有4例在RICU住院期间死亡,9例患者出院后在家中需要有创机械通气。A组患者在RICU的总住院时间为38±14天,而B组为33.2±11天。两组大多数患者恢复了独立或辅助行走的能力。出院时,仅A组的6MWD结果有显著改善(p < .001)。仅A组的MIP有所改善(p < .05),两组的VAS评分均有所改善,但A组的改善更明显(p < .001),B组的改善程度较小(p < .05)。
与接受标准药物治疗和逐步下床活动的患者相比,因急性呼吸衰竭发作后病情危急而入住RICU且多数情况下需要机械通气的COPD患者从早期综合肺康复中获益。