• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韦氏儿童智力量表(WISC)可能并非小学阶段少数族裔儿童学业表现的有效预测指标。

The WISC may not be a valid predictor of school performance for primary-grade minority children.

作者信息

Goldman R D, Hartig L K

出版信息

Am J Ment Defic. 1976 May;80(6):583-7.

PMID:961723
Abstract

In the present investigation we studied the validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) for predicting several criterial teachers' ratings for primary-grade black, Anglo, and Mexican-American children. The results were rather striking: although validities for the combined groups were good (rs near .6), the validities calculated within each group presented a different picture. Validities were good for the Anglo children but near zero for the black and Mexican-American children. These results suggest that the WISC may be of little value in the assessment of the educability of minority children. The implications of these results for educational placement and the heredity-environment controversy were discussed.

摘要

在本研究中,我们考察了韦氏儿童智力量表(WISC)预测小学阶段黑人、盎格鲁和墨西哥裔美国儿童的几项教师关键评分的效度。结果相当惊人:虽然合并组的效度良好(相关系数接近0.6),但在每个组内计算出的效度呈现出不同的情况。盎格鲁儿童的效度良好,但黑人和墨西哥裔美国儿童的效度接近零。这些结果表明,WISC在评估少数族裔儿童的可教育性方面可能价值不大。讨论了这些结果对教育安置以及遗传与环境争议的影响。

相似文献

1
The WISC may not be a valid predictor of school performance for primary-grade minority children.韦氏儿童智力量表(WISC)可能并非小学阶段少数族裔儿童学业表现的有效预测指标。
Am J Ment Defic. 1976 May;80(6):583-7.
2
Ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and pattern of WISC scores as variables that affect psychologists' estimates of "effective intelligence".种族、社会经济地位以及韦氏智力量表分数模式作为影响心理学家对“有效智力”评估的变量。
J Clin Psychol. 1976 Apr;32(2):362-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197604)32:2<362::aid-jclp2270320233>3.0.co;2-u.
3
Performance of black and white South African children on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children--Revised and the Kaufman Assessment Battery.南非黑人和白人儿童在韦氏儿童智力量表修订版及考夫曼评估电池上的表现。
Psychol Rep. 2000 Jun;86(3 Pt 1):727-37. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2000.86.3.727.
4
Intercorrelations among tests of general mental ability and achievement for black and white deaf children.
Percept Mot Skills. 1978 Jun;46(3 Pt 2):1107-13. doi: 10.2466/pms.1978.46.3c.1107.
5
Comparison of Bender-Gestalt and WISC correlations for Puerto Rican, White and Negro children.波多黎各儿童、白人儿童和黑人儿童的本德尔格式塔测验与韦氏儿童智力量表相关性比较。
J Clin Psychol. 1975 Jul;31(3):465-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197507)31:3<465::aid-jclp2270310322>3.0.co;2-k.
6
Construct validity of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fourth UK Edition with a referred Irish sample: Wechsler and Cattell-Horn-Carroll model comparisons with 15 subtests.韦氏儿童智力量表第四版英国修订版在爱尔兰转诊样本中的结构效度:韦氏与卡特尔-霍恩-卡罗尔模型对15个分测验的比较
Br J Educ Psychol. 2017 Sep;87(3):383-407. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12155. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
7
Efficiency of Peabody Picture Vocabulary in estimating WISC scores for delinquents.皮博迪图片词汇测验在评估少年犯韦氏智力量表分数方面的有效性。
Psychol Rep. 1976 Apr;38(2):359-62. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1976.38.2.359.
8
The criterion-related validity of the WISC-R performance scale and other nonverbal IQ tests for deaf children.韦氏儿童智力量表修订版操作量表及其他非言语智商测试对聋童的效标关联效度。
Am Ann Deaf. 1989 Dec;134(5):329-32. doi: 10.1353/aad.2012.0551.
9
Incremental validity of WISC-IV(UK) factor index scores with a referred Irish sample: predicting performance on the WIAT-II(UK.).WISC-IV(英国版)因子指数得分对爱尔兰转诊样本的增量效度:预测WIAT-II(英国版)的表现
Br J Educ Psychol. 2014 Dec;84(Pt 4):667-84. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12056. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
10
Assessment of mentally retarded children with the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children.使用考夫曼儿童评估成套测验对智障儿童进行评估。
Am J Ment Defic. 1985 Jan;89(4):367-71.

引用本文的文献

1
Toward operationalizing a psychoeducational definition of learning disabilities.迈向学习障碍心理教育定义的可操作性
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1980 Mar;8(1):5-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00918158.