Suppr超能文献

多阶段标记辅助选择在多个数量性状改良中的效率

Efficiency of multistage marker-assisted selection in the improvement of multiple quantitative traits.

作者信息

Xie C, Xu S

机构信息

Department of Botany and Plant Science, University of California, Riverside 92521-0124, USA.

出版信息

Heredity (Edinb). 1998 Apr;80 ( Pt 4):489-98. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00308.x.

Abstract

The application of marker-assisted selection (MAS) to breeding programmes depends on its relative cost and the expected economic return compared to conventional phenotypic selection. The relative efficiency of MAS can be increased through a two-stage selection scheme or through marker-based, multiple-trait improvement. However, the effectiveness of these alternatives has not been quantified. In this study, we evaluate the efficiency of MAS relative to conventional phenotypic selection and marker-only selection in multistage selection for the improvement of multiple traits. We further incorporate the costs of obtaining measurements on phenotypic characters and marker loci into the objective function to evaluate the efficiency of MAS with respect to the gain per unit cost. Deterministic analyses indicate that excluding costs, multiple-trait MAS can be used to increase the aggregate breeding values in quantitative characters and is expected to be more effective than conventional selection or single-trait MAS. Two-stage MAS has a slightly reduced gain because of culling in the first stage. If the objective function is to maximize the gain per unit cost, multiple-trait MAS is inferior to phenotypic selection in most of the selection schemes investigated when the cost ratio (r) of obtaining measurements on phenotypic characters to scoring marker loci is less than unity (r < or = 1.0) and the heritability (h2) is greater than 0.3. The efficiency of MAS increases as r increases and h2 decreases. For MAS to be more effective, it is necessary to decrease further the cost associated with molecular marker assays.

摘要

标记辅助选择(MAS)在育种计划中的应用取决于其相对成本以及与传统表型选择相比的预期经济回报。通过两阶段选择方案或基于标记的多性状改良可以提高MAS的相对效率。然而,这些替代方法的有效性尚未得到量化。在本研究中,我们评估了在多阶段选择中MAS相对于传统表型选择和仅基于标记的选择在改良多个性状方面的效率。我们还将获取表型性状和标记位点测量值的成本纳入目标函数,以评估MAS相对于单位成本增益的效率。确定性分析表明,不考虑成本时,多性状MAS可用于提高数量性状的综合育种值,并且预计比传统选择或单性状MAS更有效。由于第一阶段的淘汰,两阶段MAS的增益略有降低。如果目标函数是使单位成本增益最大化,那么在大多数研究的选择方案中,当获取表型性状测量值与标记位点评分的成本比(r)小于1(r≤1.0)且遗传力(h2)大于0.3时,多性状MAS不如表型选择。MAS的效率随着r的增加和h2的降低而提高。为了使MAS更有效,有必要进一步降低与分子标记分析相关的成本。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验