Robinson P H, Chalupa W, Sniffen C J, Julien W E, Sato H, Watanabe K, Fujieda T, Suzuki H
Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.
J Dairy Sci. 1998 May;81(5):1364-73. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75700-5.
The purpose of this study was to separate the effects of ruminally protected Lys from effects of ruminally protected Met on the performance of lactating dairy cows fed a ration calculated to be first-limiting in intestinally delivered Lys and second-limiting in intestinally delivered Met. Thirty multiparous Holstein cows were examined in a 20-wk study that started on wk 5 postpartum. Rations contained timothy silage, corn silage, barley, corn, corn gluten meal, and soybean meal. Treatments were 1) no supplemental amino acids, 2) 21 g/d of intestinally available Lys, and 3) 22 g/d of intestinally available Lys and 6 g/d of intestinally available Met. Post-experimental calculations suggested that, in contrast to the objective, the unsupplemented ration was colimiting in intestinally available His (0.96 of requirement), followed by Lys (1.00), digestible ruminally undegraded protein (1.01), Ile (1.03), Arg (1.04), Val (1.10), and Met (1.14). In this context, the virtually identical performance of cows fed the unsupplemented ration and cows fed the ration supplemented with ruminally protected Lys demonstrated that dairy cows did not respond to enhanced intestinal supplies of Lys when Lys was not calculated to be the first-limiting nutrient. In contrast, for cows fed rations supplemented with both ruminally protected Lys and ruminally protected Met, the production of both milk protein (40 g/d) and fat (40 g/d) was numerically increased to an extent that was consistent with earlier reported studies, although calculations did not indicate that performance was limited by intestinal supplies of Lys or Met. This result, which may be disputed because of a lack of statistical significance, suggests that Met, apparently unlike Lys, may enhance the production of milk components beyond an enhancement expected because of its role as a limiting amino acid.
本研究的目的是将瘤胃保护性赖氨酸的作用与瘤胃保护性蛋氨酸的作用区分开来,这些作用体现在给泌乳奶牛饲喂一种日粮时的生产性能上,该日粮经计算在肠道可利用赖氨酸方面为第一限制性因素,在肠道可利用蛋氨酸方面为第二限制性因素。在一项为期20周的研究中对30头经产荷斯坦奶牛进行了检查,该研究于产后第5周开始。日粮包含猫尾草青贮、玉米青贮、大麦、玉米、玉米蛋白粉和豆粕。处理方式为:1)不补充氨基酸;2)21克/天的肠道可利用赖氨酸;3)22克/天的肠道可利用赖氨酸和6克/天的肠道可利用蛋氨酸。实验后的计算表明,与目标相反,未补充氨基酸的日粮在肠道可利用组氨酸(为需求量的0.96)方面存在共同限制,其次是赖氨酸(1.00)、可消化瘤胃未降解蛋白质(1.01)、异亮氨酸(1.03)、精氨酸(1.04)、缬氨酸(1.10)和蛋氨酸(1.14)。在此背景下,饲喂未补充氨基酸日粮的奶牛与饲喂补充瘤胃保护性赖氨酸日粮的奶牛表现几乎相同,这表明当赖氨酸未被计算为第一限制性营养素时,奶牛对肠道中赖氨酸供应增加没有反应。相反,对于饲喂同时补充瘤胃保护性赖氨酸和瘤胃保护性蛋氨酸日粮的奶牛,乳蛋白(40克/天)和脂肪(40克/天)的产量在数值上均有所增加,增加程度与早期报道的研究一致,尽管计算结果并未表明生产性能受肠道赖氨酸或蛋氨酸供应的限制。由于缺乏统计学显著性,这一结果可能存在争议,但其表明蛋氨酸显然与赖氨酸不同,它可能会提高乳成分的产量,超出因其作为限制性氨基酸的作用而预期的提高幅度。